See this list of entries in which MSJ is named. h
Post# of 9903
Posted On: 09/08/2013 4:00:54 PM
See this list of entries in which MSJ is named.
http://www.scjn.gob.mx/CentroBusqueda/results...an%20Jorge
This is the top one: http://ius.scjn.gob.mx/paginas/externas/detal...?id=160700
Looks like the judgement of 17 August 2011 was a majority verdict 4 to 1.
"Live under review 2634/2010. Minera San Jorge, SA de CV and others. August 17, 2011. Majority of four votes. Dissenting: William I. Ortiz Mayagoita. Speaker: Arturo Zaldivar Lelo de Larrea. Secretary: Ydalia Perez Fernandez Ceja."
I believe this was about the application to have the titles transferred to BGL.
Also looks like BGL argued in Augist 2011 that the Federal Court did not have jurisdiction to rule. Here is what they said about that:
http://www.scjn.gob.mx/CentroBusqueda/results...an%20Jorge
This is the top one: http://ius.scjn.gob.mx/paginas/externas/detal...?id=160700
Looks like the judgement of 17 August 2011 was a majority verdict 4 to 1.
"Live under review 2634/2010. Minera San Jorge, SA de CV and others. August 17, 2011. Majority of four votes. Dissenting: William I. Ortiz Mayagoita. Speaker: Arturo Zaldivar Lelo de Larrea. Secretary: Ydalia Perez Fernandez Ceja."
I believe this was about the application to have the titles transferred to BGL.
Also looks like BGL argued in Augist 2011 that the Federal Court did not have jurisdiction to rule. Here is what they said about that:
" Article 104 of the Constitution of the United Mexican States, which provides that the concurrent jurisdiction is updated to cases where only affect private interests, we see that the transfer of the securities of mining concessions is not located in this course because it transcends to the way it exploits a good subject to a system of knowledge that links the public interest and involves federal powers. Therefore, the resolution of conflicts arising from such transfer is exclusively federal jurisdiction in accordance with Articles 9 and 10 of the National Assets Law, which states that the property subject to the public domain of the Federation shall be exclusively under the jurisdiction of the federal powers, even when disputes relate to the rights to those."
(0)
(0)