Now I'm really beginning to understand why any cou
Post# of 9903
Posted On: 09/07/2013 3:26:27 PM
Now I'm really beginning to understand why any court proceedings that BGL brought in relation to their dispute with MSJ were clearly doomed to failure at the start.
When you think about it it's clear. To me there seems to have been either an EXTREME lack of due diligence by BGL (or their Attorneys) as to who owned what, who was a registered Director of which company?, Did that company actually exist? (They don't seem to have even checked the Mexican companies register??). What were the terms and conditions in their contract with MSJ that BGL needed to be especially careful of? What clauses not to accidentally invoke, thereby voiding the entire contract!
Holy smoke guys! It's like if you buy a TV brand new which is guaranteed for a whole year and the next week it breaks, but, before you call the company to arrange a repair man to come and fix it, you open it up with a screw driver, and try to fix it yourself. By doing that you VOID the contract with the company you bought it from. Why? Because you have contravened the terms and conditions of your contract with the TV manufacturer as BGL did in its contract with MSJ.
It's that simple.
Seems to me that BGL should sue their Attorneys for giving them such extremely poor advice - rather than name a company Director as co defendant when he doesn't even work for the company! they say he is a Director of Oh yes, then there's Barnet who even signed the contract for SRGE and didn't even work for the company at the time. Great job in checking that one out as well guys. Wish I was as good as those attorneys!
When you think about it it's clear. To me there seems to have been either an EXTREME lack of due diligence by BGL (or their Attorneys) as to who owned what, who was a registered Director of which company?, Did that company actually exist? (They don't seem to have even checked the Mexican companies register??). What were the terms and conditions in their contract with MSJ that BGL needed to be especially careful of? What clauses not to accidentally invoke, thereby voiding the entire contract!
Holy smoke guys! It's like if you buy a TV brand new which is guaranteed for a whole year and the next week it breaks, but, before you call the company to arrange a repair man to come and fix it, you open it up with a screw driver, and try to fix it yourself. By doing that you VOID the contract with the company you bought it from. Why? Because you have contravened the terms and conditions of your contract with the TV manufacturer as BGL did in its contract with MSJ.
It's that simple.
Seems to me that BGL should sue their Attorneys for giving them such extremely poor advice - rather than name a company Director as co defendant when he doesn't even work for the company! they say he is a Director of Oh yes, then there's Barnet who even signed the contract for SRGE and didn't even work for the company at the time. Great job in checking that one out as well guys. Wish I was as good as those attorneys!
(0)
(0)Southridge Enterprises Inc. (SRGE) Stock Research Links
Scroll down for more posts ▼