Investors Hangout Stock Message Boards Logo
  • Mailbox
  • Favorites
  • Boards
    • The Hangout
    • NASDAQ
    • NYSE
    • OTC Markets
    • All Boards
  • Whats Hot!
    • Recent Activity
    • Most Viewed Boards
    • Most Viewed Posts
    • Most Posted
    • Most Followed
    • Top Boards
    • Newest Boards
    • Newest Members
  • Blog
    • Recent Blog Posts
    • Recently Updated
    • News
    • Stocks
    • Crypto
    • Investing
    • Business
    • Markets
    • Economy
    • Real Estate
    • Personal Finance
  • Market Movers
  • Interactive Charts
  • Login - Join Now FREE!
  1. Home ›
  2. Stock Message Boards ›
  3. Stock Boards ›
  4. Southridge Enterprises Inc. (SRGE) Message Board

Now I'm really beginning to understand why any cou

Message Board Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Replies (1)                   Post New Msg
Edit Msg () | Previous | Next


Post# of 9903
Posted On: 09/07/2013 3:26:27 PM
Posted By: Shazbat
Re: rjbluesky #1252
Now I'm really beginning to understand why any court proceedings that BGL brought in relation to their dispute with MSJ were clearly doomed to failure at the start.

When you think about it it's clear. To me there seems to have been either an EXTREME lack of due diligence by BGL (or their Attorneys) as to who owned what, who was a registered Director of which company?, Did that company actually exist? (They don't seem to have even checked the Mexican companies register??). What were the terms and conditions in their contract with MSJ that BGL needed to be especially careful of? What clauses not to accidentally invoke, thereby voiding the entire contract! 

Holy smoke guys! It's like if you buy a TV brand new which is guaranteed for a whole year and the next week it breaks, but, before you call the company to arrange a repair man to come and fix it, you open it up with a screw driver, and try to fix it yourself. By doing that you VOID the contract with the company you bought it from. Why? Because you have contravened the terms and conditions of your contract with the TV manufacturer as BGL did in its contract with MSJ.

It's that simple.

Seems to me that BGL should sue their Attorneys for giving them such extremely poor advice - rather than name a company Director as co defendant when he doesn't even work for the company! they say he is a Director of Oh yes, then there's Barnet who even signed the contract for SRGE and didn't even work for the company at the time. Great job in checking that one out as well guys. Wish I was as good as those attorneys!




(0)
(0)




Southridge Enterprises Inc. (SRGE) Stock Research Links


  1.  
  2.  


  3.  
  4.  
  5.  






Investors Hangout

Home

Mailbox

Message Boards

Favorites

Whats Hot

Blog

Settings

Privacy Policy

Terms and Conditions

Disclaimer

Contact Us

Whats Hot

Recent Activity

Most Viewed Boards

Most Viewed Posts

Most Posted Boards

Most Followed

Top Boards

Newest Boards

Newest Members

Investors Hangout Message Boards

Welcome To Investors Hangout

Stock Message Boards

American Stock Exchange (AMEX)

NASDAQ Stock Exchange (NASDAQ)

New York Stock Exchange (NYSE)

Penny Stocks - (OTC)

User Boards

The Hangout

Private

Global Markets

Australian Securities Exchange (ASX)

Euronext Amsterdam (AMS)

Euronext Brussels (BRU)

Euronext Lisbon (LIS)

Euronext Paris (PAR)

Foreign Exchange (FOREX)

Hong Kong Stock Exchange (HKEX)

London Stock Exchange (LSE)

Milan Stock Exchange (MLSE)

New Zealand Exchange (NZX)

Singapore Stock Exchange (SGX)

Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX)

Contact Investors Hangout

Email Us

Follow Investors Hangout

Twitter

YouTube

Facebook

Market Data powered by QuoteMedia. Copyright © 2025. Data delayed 15 minutes unless otherwise indicated (view delay times for all exchanges).
Analyst Ratings & Earnings by Zacks. RT=Real-Time, EOD=End of Day, PD=Previous Day. Terms of Use.

© 2025 Copyright Investors Hangout, LLC All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Policy |Do Not Sell My Information | Terms & Conditions | Disclaimer | Help | Contact Us