The terms of the purchase state... On April 23,

The terms of the purchase state...

On April 23, 2010, the Company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with Medina Property Group LLC, a
Florida limited liability company (“Medina”). Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, and upon the terms and subject to the conditions thereof, the
Company agreed to purchase 80% of certain mining interests of Medina known as the Chloride Copper Project, a former copper producer
comprised of a mineral deposit and some infrastructure located near Kingston, Arizona (the “Copper Mine”).
The Company's acquisition of the Chloride Copper Project was accounted for in accordance with ASC 805 Business Combinations and the
Company has allocated the purchase price based upon the fair value of the net assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date.
The purchase price was $7,505,529 which, pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, The purchase price included the issuance of 12,750,000 shares
of common stock by the Company to Medina or its assignees, return of 5,358,000 by Black Diamond and the payment of $125,000 to the
original seller of certain equipment where the Chloride Copper Mine is located, as designated by Medina in the Purchase Agreement. The
purchase price was determined based on the Company's analysis of a recently completed comparable acquisition and based on the value of the
associated underlying shares of the Company’s common stock which value of $1.00 per share represented the offering price of the Company’s
Common Stock in its most recently completed equity transaction prior to the date of the Purchase Agreement. The Company recognized
goodwill of $7,602,069 and assumed $384,540 in liabilities, which consisted of a $360,000 promissory note and $3,040 in accrued interest and
$21,500 in accounts payable.

Was 5277 Partners one of Medina's assignees?  If so, why and what were the terms?  Were they not issued until October 2010 when he filed the 13d?

Why don't the number of shares stated as beneficial holder not add up to what he should hold?