Well OK- the register must be VERY misleading-what it looks like is CWRN served Geo sometime Sept 2012 -usually only have 20-30 days to respond to complaint or its all over- no mistake or neglect on part of defendant excuse where i live-and not even any defense that somebody didnt receive notice-which appears to be the case re Ca entry of default below which was entered Dec 1-(entry of default-not default judgement-last par of sec 587 could be better worded)- what maybe 75-80 days after Geo was served in Sept?- so more than plenty of time for Geo to show- I thought it was absolutely bizarre they didnt show-so there were filings shortly AFTER Dec 1which may have been by Geo? -
in the Texas case I have imaged or read all the filings but I havent seen what those post complaint pleadings said in CA-no PC experts here were able to access the content??????
I hate looking these things up-and some of these legal sites can be really tough to use-even when I input correct defendant and plaintiff I almost never get any hits-they have very poor search engines- and I never did find the Ca case last fall despite searching for months because didnt have case number and search engine didnt respond to defendant plaintiff input-perhaps young paralegals who live and breathe PCs, having grown up w them, have some tricks to pull up Ca pleadings-no PC's in law school when I was there- hate having to fight these sites because I fight legal system fraud 24/7 as it is and these boards are my only relief from that so hate dealing w legal here-so if anybody is able to pull up content of those post complaint Ca pleadings in east court of San Diego go ahead and do so so we can make some sense out of this bizarre seeming no show by Geo re complaint served in Sept
in the Texas case I have imaged or read all the filings but I havent seen what those post complaint pleadings said in CA-no PC experts here were able to access the content??????
I hate looking these things up-and some of these legal sites can be really tough to use-even when I input correct defendant and plaintiff I almost never get any hits-they have very poor search engines- and I never did find the Ca case last fall despite searching for months because didnt have case number and search engine didnt respond to defendant plaintiff input-perhaps young paralegals who live and breathe PCs, having grown up w them, have some tricks to pull up Ca pleadings-no PC's in law school when I was there- hate having to fight these sites because I fight legal system fraud 24/7 as it is and these boards are my only relief from that so hate dealing w legal here-so if anybody is able to pull up content of those post complaint Ca pleadings in east court of San Diego go ahead and do so so we can make some sense out of this bizarre seeming no show by Geo re complaint served in Sept
California Code of Civil Procedure Section 587
Legal Research Home > California Laws > Code of Civil Procedure > California Code of Civil Procedure Section 587
587. An application by a plaintiff for entry of default under subdivision (a), (b), or (c) of Section 585 or Section 586 shall include an affidavit stating that a copy of the application has been mailed to the defendant's attorney of record or, if none, to the defendant at his or her last known address and the date on which the copy was mailed. If no such address of the defendant is known to the plaintiff or plaintiff's attorney, the affidavit shall state that fact. No default under subdivision (a), (b), or (c) of Section 585 or Section 586 shall be entered, unless the affidavit is filed. The nonreceipt of the notice shall not invalidate or constitute ground for setting aside any judgment.Section: Previous 585 585.5 586 587 587.5 Next
Last modified: February 22, 2013
