? Why are you always making everything personal? This is about business... Your business... that we are invested in. I'm sorry if I have no compassion for someone who is trying to turn things around and make it look like people are trying to attack him personally when they are trying to discuss business. For some reason you keep trying to say people are talking about your family, personally attacking you, are "terrorists", liars, banned you... hurt your chat feelings...etc when they question you. You never seem to take responsibility for anything you've caused. You seem to be the one trying to make things personal.
If you're wondering what my issue is it should be clear that I'm not a fan of a CEO acting like a child on a message board. When we come here as adults to discuss issues and you start crying and demanding people be banned because they are questioning you then there is a huge problem. It shows 1) you don't want to answer the questions cause you're hiding something; 2) you're not professional enough to handle the conversations tactfully and explain yourself; 3) you'd rather try to turn it around on the person and call them a basher or have them banned so you can feel like you got your way.
I guess you can't see the connection between the 600 million shares that they are saying you sold and the 600 million shares you said you were going to retire but as far as we know still haven't... Let me break this down for you. You said you were going to retire around 600 million shares. Months later, you still have not fulfilled your promise. You tried to blame not doing it on your ex partner. We found out that is not correct and he has nothing to do with it and that it is you we are still waiting on. Rather than doing what you said you would, you have made many of the investors question whether or not you actually are going to do it or if this will be another Steve Samblis move where he blames it on someone else because it didn't work out. So, you're not being wronged here Steve... we are! By you not following through with what you said you would do! You're the one wronging us. You can not logically blame a person for questioning whether you sold the 600 million shares instead since you keep coming up with excuses on why you haven't retired them yet.
"When the Q is filed you will see I still have all my shares." Well, gee Steve that's funny cause according to you you were going to retire some of your shares as well. So thanks for clarifying that you haven't retired your shares either. At least we now all know not to expect the OS to be lowered on this Q. Please forgive me if I don't seem to find comfort in knowing you just said that.
If you're wondering what my issue is it should be clear that I'm not a fan of a CEO acting like a child on a message board. When we come here as adults to discuss issues and you start crying and demanding people be banned because they are questioning you then there is a huge problem. It shows 1) you don't want to answer the questions cause you're hiding something; 2) you're not professional enough to handle the conversations tactfully and explain yourself; 3) you'd rather try to turn it around on the person and call them a basher or have them banned so you can feel like you got your way.
I guess you can't see the connection between the 600 million shares that they are saying you sold and the 600 million shares you said you were going to retire but as far as we know still haven't... Let me break this down for you. You said you were going to retire around 600 million shares. Months later, you still have not fulfilled your promise. You tried to blame not doing it on your ex partner. We found out that is not correct and he has nothing to do with it and that it is you we are still waiting on. Rather than doing what you said you would, you have made many of the investors question whether or not you actually are going to do it or if this will be another Steve Samblis move where he blames it on someone else because it didn't work out. So, you're not being wronged here Steve... we are! By you not following through with what you said you would do! You're the one wronging us. You can not logically blame a person for questioning whether you sold the 600 million shares instead since you keep coming up with excuses on why you haven't retired them yet.
"When the Q is filed you will see I still have all my shares." Well, gee Steve that's funny cause according to you you were going to retire some of your shares as well. So thanks for clarifying that you haven't retired your shares either. At least we now all know not to expect the OS to be lowered on this Q. Please forgive me if I don't seem to find comfort in knowing you just said that.
