OUCH! Not at all what I needed to read and posture
Post# of 5066
Posted On: 08/08/2013 7:48:16 AM
OUCH! Not at all what I needed to read and posture myself to refute this morning. Not on this board anyway. But Oh, well, it happens.
But keep in mind that there is a reason why this stock is well under a penny. If there was ANY real interest in the technology, BMSN would not be partnerless at this point.
Excuse my language at 7:30 AM EST, but that is the biggest crock of horseshit I have seen on this board to date! And that includes the spam.
The reason the stock is where it is has already been determined and reiterated by several on here. Including yourself.
Any REAL interest in the technology? The science to combat cancer? I can't even go beyond quoting my kids as I sometimes do on that one... "SERIOUSLY?"
This little company, that is very much new in terms of establishing itself as a bona fide business ready to trade with the big boys (big boys being the few in the world of treatments that call the shots, and that includes the FDA) has done more in terms of getting the job done in their efforts to actually posturing themselves for their breakout than most companies out there. You obviously have no idea what gains they have made and have done so despite the major difficulties before of them.
Further, if you dig deep enough, utilizing key words in the right places and posing the right questions to the right people, you will find that interest is indeed there. What that interest is and who exactly has it has yet to be determined entirely because that is the way the game is played when you are dealing with multi-hundreds of millions or billions of dollars.
Moreover, Dr. Koos has no interest to partner anymore than what he has up to this point. It is not his intent to partner with a BP. It is his intent to sell each successful treatment (success being determined at varying stages depending on said treatment) one way or another. So the fact that a "partnership" has not been announced is no great surprise to anyone that understands his motives.
I am all for fair debate. And you can reiterate your theories based on the vulnerability and history of penny stock companies over and over. But, please do not post your supposition that is clearly based on erroneous information and absent dd. Put that elsewhere.
But keep in mind that there is a reason why this stock is well under a penny. If there was ANY real interest in the technology, BMSN would not be partnerless at this point.
Excuse my language at 7:30 AM EST, but that is the biggest crock of horseshit I have seen on this board to date! And that includes the spam.
The reason the stock is where it is has already been determined and reiterated by several on here. Including yourself.
Any REAL interest in the technology? The science to combat cancer? I can't even go beyond quoting my kids as I sometimes do on that one... "SERIOUSLY?"
This little company, that is very much new in terms of establishing itself as a bona fide business ready to trade with the big boys (big boys being the few in the world of treatments that call the shots, and that includes the FDA) has done more in terms of getting the job done in their efforts to actually posturing themselves for their breakout than most companies out there. You obviously have no idea what gains they have made and have done so despite the major difficulties before of them.
Further, if you dig deep enough, utilizing key words in the right places and posing the right questions to the right people, you will find that interest is indeed there. What that interest is and who exactly has it has yet to be determined entirely because that is the way the game is played when you are dealing with multi-hundreds of millions or billions of dollars.
Moreover, Dr. Koos has no interest to partner anymore than what he has up to this point. It is not his intent to partner with a BP. It is his intent to sell each successful treatment (success being determined at varying stages depending on said treatment) one way or another. So the fact that a "partnership" has not been announced is no great surprise to anyone that understands his motives.
I am all for fair debate. And you can reiterate your theories based on the vulnerability and history of penny stock companies over and over. But, please do not post your supposition that is clearly based on erroneous information and absent dd. Put that elsewhere.
(0)
(0)