It is up to everyone to make up your own mind,

It is up to everyone to make up your own mind, and to determine what sounds reasonable and what does not. As I stated earlier, the I-dud moderators and pumpers are stuck in a quandary i.e., they were either lied to by William, or they themselves were lying to everyone on I-dud for months and months and months. This allowed some of them to get out at a profit, and then later brag to everyone that they had (remember "the game" PLUTUS talked about) while most everyone else lost most or all their investment.

You see, they cannot have it both ways here. Either they knew William committed an illegal act which they were a party too and William did not say what they claim he secretly promised, or the stories were made up by the people who told the stories.

Did you ever wonder why the people who told these wildly optimistic and wonderful stories never turned around and filed a lawsuit?   Wouldn't they all have the "proof" that so many were looking for and asking for?

First, lets look at the super secret meetings and phone conference calls between just one or two individuals or with a small group of "special" investors, to the exclusion of everyone else. Lets operate, to start, under the assumption that the above was true. After all, most everyone posted how they trusted these loving and "God fearing" people who were dear friends and could certainly do no wrong (remember, some even claimed they sang in choirs or preached to their own congregations).

The narrative on I-dud was that William was an honorable man and was brilliant at business and business strategy. Very interesting, because if William truly did have these super secret meetings with only one or two people, or a small group of "special" investors to the exclusion of everyone else, then he was breaking the law and could be prosecuted. And, Isn't this the "proof" some have asked for?

So, William could not possible be an "honorable man" as some claimed, and he certainly can't be called brilliant if he knowingly broke the law by disclosing "inside" information to only a few. And, to compound the problem, these same people then posted about these secret meetings and conference calls publicly, so everyone could see the illegal acts committed, and by whom. See the problem here? See the dilemma?

Did you ever wonder why the pumpers and moderators didn't post openly that William lied to them? For those who remember, I very quickly posted when I realized William lied to me after the judge ruled on the Overcash lawsuit. The evidence was plain to see.

However, I can't blame people if they did not remember my posts, because I was attacked immediately by the moderators and pumpers, who claimed I had an agenda, and my posts were quickly deleted.

Some may still remember these posts, but it is too late now. So why don't they comment today that I was right?

For those who do not remember, I talked to William numerous times about the M&A Associates lawsuit (Overcash), and William posted on MMTE's face book page as well. William told me the Overcash lawsuit was without merit, and that it was frivolous. William also claimed he didn't know anything about the lawsuit, because the Overcash attorneys never notified him of anything (no subpoena received). William sent out a press release indicating much the same, and further stated that the lawsuit would have no material impact on shareholders.

I later pressed William for more details regarding the Overcash lawsuit. William was emphatic that Overcash had no grounds for the lawsuit. In fact, William declared that if Overcash pursued this lawsuit, it would be him that would pay, and Overcash would likely go to jail for a very long time. William then asked that I convey this information to shareholders on I-dud, which as most investors might remember, I did. I was reluctant to interject myself in a legal matter, but agreed because William always seemed honest to me (in other words, I had never caught William in an obvious lie). William assured me I had nothing to be concerned about, because the lawsuit would be overturned on a simple technicality.

In the end, as most now know, the judge ruled against William. In the official court records, we learn that William borrowed around $40,000 from Joe Overcash for MMTE's change of direction from oil drilling to lithium mining after Overcash was removed as CEO of MMTE and replaced by William.

You may want to re-read this last sentence, because William obviously was aware of the money Overcash borrowed him. And, what did Overcash expect for the money he loaned William? Overcash expected to get a piece of the action.

Furthermore, we learned that William refused to give Overcash anything for the money he loaned, and that William denied ever receiving the money. However, Overcash produced a receipt from William Lieberman which included a note indicating Overcash would receive a percentage of MMTE's revenue.

As you can see, the official court records indicate William lied to me about everything regarding this lawsuit, and the technicality William talked about that would get the suit thrown out. And not just me, Lieberman lied to all shareholders about this lawsuit.

The way Willy defense worked was as follows: William had several attorney's on retainer, and each was assigned a different task. To be clear, all the attorneys William had on retainer did in fact work for him. So the technically William felt would get the case thrown out rested on the ridiculous notion that the attorney notified about the lawsuit was working on a "different" task for Lieberman, and not the Overcash lawsuit. The judge laughed at this assertion, and promptly ruled against William.

While many may remember the fine points regarding this lawsuit. You may not know that I was extremely upset about William lying to me, and I posted about this on the I-dud board (numerous times). You may not have seen these posts, because they were deleted and I was attacked for having an agenda. I tried to convey to all investors that MMTE would be diluted by hundreds of million of shares because of the Overcash settlement, and that this would have a big material impact on each and every shareholder.

Furthermore, I cautioned shareholders that we may not be able to trust William any more. I posted this because if William had simply said he made a mistake at one point in time and now he would need to make things right. I suspect most, including myself, would have accepted his explanation and forgiven him for the hit to share price that would likely come.

But we also learned that William could have simply repaid Overcash the $40,000 with interest, and the whole lawsuit would have gone away (in fact, Overcash suggested this). Obviously shares would need to be printed to repay the loan (dilution), but the effect would likely have been temporary as long as everyone trusted in William and MMTE continued to move forward with its business plan.

But now, with William confirmed to have lied, what more might he be lying to shareholders about? How much did we really know about the concessions? What were the terms mandated for each lease? Why wasn't a NI43-101 ever done? What really happened with all the money during each of the many "capital raises" William did? What happened to the over one billion shares William awarded himself, then no longer had, and then he awarded himself again? Did he sell (short) all these shares for his own personal profit? Is this why share prices kept falling? When I confronted William about why share prices fell after each and every press release, he said "money can be made both when share prices rise and when they fall?"

Was this an admission that William shorted his own company for his own personal gain and to the harm of everyone else?

Do you remember the excuses the I-dud moderators and pumpers posted?

One of the most memorable came from Rocky, who argued that when a company or corporation told investors things that were obviously untrue, it was not really a lie. You see, said Rocky, when a company says things that are deceptive and untrue, it is not a lie because it is for the good of the company. What? I mean, what did Rocky just say? Do people remember this explanation? Did anyone wonder what kind of planet this guy came from? Keep in mind, Rocky claimed he was a God fearing man who preached to his own congregation. The same congregation he took $20,000 from and stuck it in MMTE (did he ever tell his congregation). I guess honesty was never preached in Rocky's Bible.