Older deleted posts..... Not here to reply to frivolous guided negataions of Treaty to lead the conversation in a negative direction beneficial to none with The will for treaty to succeed. I will say that assumptions run rampit from those that plot against this company as thats all they have left. They know better, they just want engagment for reasons we already know. Any negating statement about what the company is currently doing, anything about the Brown, or any other lease , or swabbing and getting so called only water, has no merrit. When reasons and actuallities prd, they will simply move on to more lies. All adding up to ultimately remove them and their devices while repayment for all these blatant lies and assumptions about Treaty will be swift and met with the power of law. You have to ask yourself, would the company give those against it any information? Because thats the only way they would ever know the whole truth. Otherwise its just assumptions put together on a negative frame of which cannot hold itself upright and is pointless other than self benefit of those lieng to try to destroy the undestroyable. Yep, a waste of time if you ask me. The lawsuits are laughable and at worst, will do absolutely nothing to treaty other than vindicate them. Any assumptions about Belize not having oil or not showing proof of oil has no merrit. As last i checked, the company never allowed any of the losers in to see what they have found. Lol , they think its only 6 million Barrels lol. Anyways imho number three , when complete, will prove more than 6 million barrels and guess what, we will hear complete silence at that point because i dont beleive any person with a brain will go against a company producing that kind of oil. Its already all over, no point in kicking and screaming. The company has footing to run now, some just like to prolong their pain. Oh , and gotta love the idea that treaty only gets a few percent of mitchel lol. Because going in , knowing the wells would be producing what they actually are producing would give them 3 bopd with that deal..Lol so going in, treaty would have been losing money in the best case scenerio? Riiiiight... I think we know better than a deal of that sort. Last i checked, none of those that are stating 9% actually work for treaty. They are using assumptions as has seemed to have been the norm. Assume the tax rate, assume the amount the land owner gets , assume the deal, assume the deal has old deals involved. We all know what assuming does.. The entire debate about that is over a theory lol and a giant set of incorrect assumptions. Imho. Either way, going forward now that treaty has momentum will be more like a train being held back by an ant that wants to see the train derail lol. My B. 7 or 8 ants. And the videos could be from anywhere? Wow. Nuff said. I guess the company posting thhese videos on their site would risk the entire company for a video elsewhere other than where they say. I guess Bull has permission to just go on any lease anywhere and guage while oil is filling the same exact tank battery we all saw being built..... Wow. Hopes are high for some, for others, theres a pps rise and oil filling tanks. You better Belize it! San juan 3!
US CAPITOL IS NOT TREATY. Why was this off topic link put here for treaty investors? Just curious as it has nothing to do with us. There is also a water well drilled in june called san juan well 3. I did not post that link here because it would be off topic. Anyways major oil in treatys san juan 3 imho i dont care about us capitols san juan 3. Desperate times for all against TREATY.
US CAPITOL IS NOT TREATY. Why was this off topic link put here for treaty investors? Just curious as it has nothing to do with us. There is also a water well drilled in june called san juan well 3. I did not post that link here because it would be off topic. Anyways major oil in treatys san juan 3 imho i dont care about us capitols san juan 3. Desperate times for all against TREATY.
