Here's my original response which of course we
Post# of 39368
Posted On: 06/16/2013 10:55:35 AM
Here's my original response which of course went the way of the world.
Kanola, it was a pervious judgment, which means ummm it can't hold water.
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/pervious
That is similar to a proposal I got from a painting contractor one time who wanted half of the total cost upfront, which he stated as follows:
Three thousand dollars prepping and painting all exterior surfaces. 15 hunert up front, 15 hunert upon completion.
I had to ask him what a hunert was.
The posts simply contradict each other. Judgement was mentioned twice. You called it a judgement. Misleading to those reading the boards. IMO they don't even have a case, but that is what the court will decide.
TDBowieknife Quote # 1
TDBowieknife Quote # 1
Quote:
This time in the Great State of Texas. The petitioners already have a judgment that Treaty has refused to pay.
Quote:
I never said THIS was a judgment. I said they had one.
TDBowieknife
Quote:
I am not calling it a judgment. The way I understand it is they have a pervious judgment they are trying to collect on.
(0)
(0)