It's very unfortunate that when Steve is critiqued
Post# of 45510
It's very unfortunate that when Steve is critiqued, he resorts to calling people "negative" or "bashers." I have seen more than one long here point out inconsistencies in a respectful manner, only to be met with evasive replies or accused of negativity.
Was there a formal response from Steve's attorneys? Because that was what we were supposed to get today. A formal response. And again, people's expectations were built up only to be met with disappointment. Seriously, why say that if it is not going to happen? But he does it ALL the time.
If you see my last post, Steve responded that "Clearly your opinion of me will not change so there is nothing I can say to you." Huh? I was pointing out things that many people here agree with - things that many people here are VERY frustrated with. Namely, your incredible consistencies.
Steve, you have ostracised a large number of longs here. People who were very hopeful and helpful to you in the past (not the least of which is warrior_king who was incredibly dedicated at one time but has since lost faith) need you to be better.
Anyone who has been around here for a year knows who I am. For you to say, you've looked at my posts and they are all negative tells me you don't know a true long with hard questions from a basher.. Sadly, I am not the first person you have accused of this.
I hate to put it to you like this, but we need you to be better. TRUST ME. I am not the only one that feels this way. Your attorneys should have put out a formal letter today - LIKE YOU SAID THEY WOULD. Instead, a bunch of shareholders waited for nothing -again.
Good luck everyone,
SL