GRLF did a massive capital restructure in late 2025/early 2026:
1. *Authorized shares cut*: 60,000,000,000 → 50,000,000 shares — a *1,200-to-1 reduction*
2. *Reverse split 2,500:1*: Share count went from ∼16.7B shares to ∼6.68M shares post-split
3. *Current outstanding*: ∼6.68M shares 20e6033a8773
*Before vs After the split:*
**Metric** **Pre-split 2025** **Post-split 2026**
**Shares out** ~16.7B ~6.68M
**Authorized** 60B 50M
**Price example** $0.0000037 $0.0093
**Market cap** ~$62K ~$62K
1. *Old share count*: That $0.28 EPS was likely using pre-split share count of ∼1.4M shares. After the 2,500:1 reverse split, EPS recalculates.
2. *FY2025 real math*: $400,087 net income ÷ 6,680,943 shares = *$0.0599 EPS*
3. *Current EPS*: Some sites show TTM EPS $0.0500 to $0.1750 depending on exact share count/date. The $0.28 was pre-split.
*Dilution risk now:*
*Reduced massively.* Before: 60B authorized, 16.7B out = 43.3B shares they could dump.
*Now*: 50M authorized, 6.68M out = 43.3M shares possible dilution. Still 6.5x the float, but way better
Management did this specifically to "reduce shareholder dilution risk and create a capital structure that attracts institutional capital"
*Updated PEG with post-split numbers:*
**Metric** **Value**
**Price** $0.0093
**EPS FY2025** $0.0599
**PE** 0.16
**Revenue growth** 185%
**PEG** 0.16 ÷ 185 = **0.0009**
*Fair value @ PEG 1.0* = $0.0599 × 185 = *$11.08/share*
So yes — even with the corrected $0.06 EPS, PEG math says *$11.08/share fair value* vs $0.0093 current. *99.9% undervalued*.
*But*: 6.68M shares, $112K market cap, 8K avg volume. You still can’t buy size. And it’s OTC Pink with unaudited financials.
*Bottom line*: The reverse split cleaned up the share structure and explains the EPS confusion. The $0.28 EPS was pre-split. Post-split EPS is ∼$0.06. Still 0.0009 PEG. Still 1,000x upside on paper if you believe the $400K net income and 185% growth are sustainable.
1. *Authorized shares cut*: 60,000,000,000 → 50,000,000 shares — a *1,200-to-1 reduction*
2. *Reverse split 2,500:1*: Share count went from ∼16.7B shares to ∼6.68M shares post-split
3. *Current outstanding*: ∼6.68M shares 20e6033a8773
*Before vs After the split:*
**Metric** **Pre-split 2025** **Post-split 2026**
**Shares out** ~16.7B ~6.68M
**Authorized** 60B 50M
**Price example** $0.0000037 $0.0093
**Market cap** ~$62K ~$62K
1. *Old share count*: That $0.28 EPS was likely using pre-split share count of ∼1.4M shares. After the 2,500:1 reverse split, EPS recalculates.
2. *FY2025 real math*: $400,087 net income ÷ 6,680,943 shares = *$0.0599 EPS*
3. *Current EPS*: Some sites show TTM EPS $0.0500 to $0.1750 depending on exact share count/date. The $0.28 was pre-split.
*Dilution risk now:*
*Reduced massively.* Before: 60B authorized, 16.7B out = 43.3B shares they could dump.
*Now*: 50M authorized, 6.68M out = 43.3M shares possible dilution. Still 6.5x the float, but way better
Management did this specifically to "reduce shareholder dilution risk and create a capital structure that attracts institutional capital"
*Updated PEG with post-split numbers:*
**Metric** **Value**
**Price** $0.0093
**EPS FY2025** $0.0599
**PE** 0.16
**Revenue growth** 185%
**PEG** 0.16 ÷ 185 = **0.0009**
*Fair value @ PEG 1.0* = $0.0599 × 185 = *$11.08/share*
So yes — even with the corrected $0.06 EPS, PEG math says *$11.08/share fair value* vs $0.0093 current. *99.9% undervalued*.
*But*: 6.68M shares, $112K market cap, 8K avg volume. You still can’t buy size. And it’s OTC Pink with unaudited financials.
*Bottom line*: The reverse split cleaned up the share structure and explains the EPS confusion. The $0.28 EPS was pre-split. Post-split EPS is ∼$0.06. Still 0.0009 PEG. Still 1,000x upside on paper if you believe the $400K net income and 185% growth are sustainable.
