At this point I don’t even think these posts are meant to convince anyone.
The people who were going to be scared out of their shares are probably already gone. Anyone still here after all these years has already sat through the delays, the silence, the missed timelines, the theories, the attacks, and the disappointments.
So who is this really for?
It feels more like an attempt to bait Doc into responding. Say something wild enough, accuse enough, dress it up with enough legal language or AI-sounding “forensics,” and maybe he finally comes out to defend himself.
But that is not happening.
He is not going to jump onto Investors Hangout to argue over earlobes, skull shape, blurry screenshots, or another copy-and-paste legal theory. He has not responded to the sarcastic LinkedIn comments either, so I don’t know why anyone thinks this board is going to pull him out.
The photo analysis was where it got ridiculous. Taking a low-quality screenshot and trying to turn it into some forensic identity case is not serious. It reads forced. It reads like someone used AI to make a weak accusation sound smarter than it is.
And honestly, it is starting to have the opposite effect.
Instead of making the criticism look stronger, it makes the whole thing look desperate.
There are real things shareholders care about. We want current facts. We want an actual company update. We want to know whether there is a real corporate event or not.
But this daily routine of trying to scare people, discredit Doc, or make UNVC look worse with another dramatic theory is not moving anyone at this point.
Most of us still here already made our decision.
So now it is mostly entertainment.
The people who were going to be scared out of their shares are probably already gone. Anyone still here after all these years has already sat through the delays, the silence, the missed timelines, the theories, the attacks, and the disappointments.
So who is this really for?
It feels more like an attempt to bait Doc into responding. Say something wild enough, accuse enough, dress it up with enough legal language or AI-sounding “forensics,” and maybe he finally comes out to defend himself.
But that is not happening.
He is not going to jump onto Investors Hangout to argue over earlobes, skull shape, blurry screenshots, or another copy-and-paste legal theory. He has not responded to the sarcastic LinkedIn comments either, so I don’t know why anyone thinks this board is going to pull him out.
The photo analysis was where it got ridiculous. Taking a low-quality screenshot and trying to turn it into some forensic identity case is not serious. It reads forced. It reads like someone used AI to make a weak accusation sound smarter than it is.
And honestly, it is starting to have the opposite effect.
Instead of making the criticism look stronger, it makes the whole thing look desperate.
There are real things shareholders care about. We want current facts. We want an actual company update. We want to know whether there is a real corporate event or not.
But this daily routine of trying to scare people, discredit Doc, or make UNVC look worse with another dramatic theory is not moving anyone at this point.
Most of us still here already made our decision.
So now it is mostly entertainment.
7
