CHANGES IN REGISTRANTS CERTIFYING ACCO

CHANGES IN REGISTRANTS CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANT

Item 4.01

Changes in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant

On April 2, 2013, Protext Mobility, Inc. (the “Company”) was informed by its independent registered public accounting firm, Sherb & Co., LLP (“Sherb”) that it has combined its practice with RBSM LLP (“the Merger”) effective January 1, 2013. As a result of the merger and upon notice by Sherb to the Company, on that date Sherb in effect resigned as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. On April 2, 2013, RBSM LLP was engaged as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm.

The principal accountant’s reports of Sherb on the Company’s financial statements as of and for the two years ended December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 did not contain an adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, and such reports were not qualified or modified as to audit scope or accounting principles. The principal accountant’s reports of Sherb on the financial statements of the Company for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 contained an explanatory paragraph disclosing the uncertainty regarding the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

During the two years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, and through the date of this Current Report on Form 8-K, there were no disagreements with Sherb on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which if not resolved to Sherb's satisfaction would have caused it to make reference thereto in connection with its reports on the financial statements for such years. During the two years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, and through the date of this Current Report on Form 8-K, there were no reportable events of the type described in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.

During the two years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 and through the date of this Current Report on Form 8-K, the Company did not consult with RBSM with respect to any of (i) the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed; (ii) the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company's financial statements; or (iii) any matter that was either the subject of a disagreement (as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K) or an event of the type described in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.

The Company provided Sherb with a copy of the foregoing disclosure and requested Sherb to furnish the Company with a letter addressed to the Securities and Exchange Commission stating whether it agrees with the statements made therein. A copy of such letter, dated April 2, 2013 furnished by Sherb, is filed as Exhibit 16.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K.

Item 9.01

Financial Statements and Exhibits..

(a)

Financial Statements:

None.

(b)

Pro Forma Financial Information:

None.

(c)

Shell Company Transactions:

None.

2

(d)

Exhibits:

____________________________

* Filed herewith.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

Date: April 8, 2013

PROTEXT MOBILITY, INC.

By: /s/ Peter Charles

Principal Executive Officer

3

EXHIBIT 16.1

SHERB & CO LLP

New York, NY

April 2, 2013

Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, N.W.

Washington, DC 20549-7561

Dear Sirs/Madams:

We have read Item 4.01 included in the Form 8-K of Protext Mobility, Inc. (the “Company”) dated April 2, 2013 to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We agree with the statements concerning our Firm in such Form 8-K.

Very truly yours,

/S/ SHERB & CO., LLP

4