Post
of 161,750
If nobody looks at it how did they compile new data?
Who put all the work in?
Why did they bother doing all the additional work that nobody cares about.
Does the fda see it?
On the esmo poster showing a long continuing line past 48 months labeled n=7
Who are the 7 that survived past 48 months
"only 1 of the 10 low dose achieve >400 rfu"
Your numbers on the low dose are not correct
It was actually 1 of 4 at 350mg who upreg above median line.
(6 of the 10 had no follow up scans).
And 3 of those 10 were way above the medium line at baseline pdl1 test.
Not that it all matters.
Right, lots of people died because upreging pdl1 is an anti tumor escape mechanism solved by treating with ici.
Which is about to happen in eau maybe in about 6 or 7 weeks from now.
Maybe in mcrc too, maybe in less time.
Who put all the work in?
Why did they bother doing all the additional work that nobody cares about.
Does the fda see it?
On the esmo poster showing a long continuing line past 48 months labeled n=7
Who are the 7 that survived past 48 months
"only 1 of the 10 low dose achieve >400 rfu"
Your numbers on the low dose are not correct
It was actually 1 of 4 at 350mg who upreg above median line.
(6 of the 10 had no follow up scans).
And 3 of those 10 were way above the medium line at baseline pdl1 test.
Not that it all matters.
Right, lots of people died because upreging pdl1 is an anti tumor escape mechanism solved by treating with ici.
Which is about to happen in eau maybe in about 6 or 7 weeks from now.
Maybe in mcrc too, maybe in less time.
3