dont really want to get into it but please someone correct me if im wrong
directly from the "marketing department" -
used to be called "flu shots" and are now called "flu vaccines"
just like ufos are now uaps
marketing - directly from the "marketing department"
"vaccines" eliminate the ability for the "polio virus" to
- infect the person
- and therefore also prevent the spread to another person
covid and flu "vaccines" do neither of this. they
- reduce the effects of the virus, and do not prevent actual infection
- since the person still gets infected with covid but the symptoms are greatly reduced (sometimes not always -ahem- certainly not in my case covid destroyed me), the virus is still spread to others
so why are they still called "vaccines"
the few years i got the flu "vaccine", i got the flu on top of the shot making me sick so....i will opt for "never again"
they are "treatments"
they are "shots"
they are NOT "vaccines"
so straight from the "marketing department" we get " there arent enough employees to release the pfizer vax data so it would take 75 years to do so... sorry guys... oops...our bad...see ya in 75 years...NEXT!!!" is a little convenient and wreaks of collusion. par for the course from these people
directly from the "marketing department" -
used to be called "flu shots" and are now called "flu vaccines"
just like ufos are now uaps
marketing - directly from the "marketing department"
"vaccines" eliminate the ability for the "polio virus" to
- infect the person
- and therefore also prevent the spread to another person
covid and flu "vaccines" do neither of this. they
- reduce the effects of the virus, and do not prevent actual infection
- since the person still gets infected with covid but the symptoms are greatly reduced (sometimes not always -ahem- certainly not in my case covid destroyed me), the virus is still spread to others
so why are they still called "vaccines"
the few years i got the flu "vaccine", i got the flu on top of the shot making me sick so....i will opt for "never again"
they are "treatments"
they are "shots"
they are NOT "vaccines"
so straight from the "marketing department" we get " there arent enough employees to release the pfizer vax data so it would take 75 years to do so... sorry guys... oops...our bad...see ya in 75 years...NEXT!!!" is a little convenient and wreaks of collusion. par for the course from these people
Quote:Pfizer getting a bum's rap? FDA was the source of the 75 year timeline. per AI
The claim that Pfizer and the FDA tried to "hide" vaccine results for 75 years refers to a 2021 legal dispute over a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request. Here is the breakdown of what actually occurred:
Reuters
Reuters
+1
The 75-Year Timeline: This was a processing estimate provided by the FDA, not a secret "hiding" period. The agency argued that its small FOIA office (10 employees) could only review and redact sensitive personal information from the roughly 450,000 pages of data at a rate of 500 pages per month. At that pace, full disclosure would have taken approximately 75 years.
Court Intervention: In January 2022, a federal judge in Texas rejected this timeline, ruling that the release was of "paramount public importance". He ordered the FDA to drastically accelerate the process, requiring the release of 55,000 pages every 30 days. Most of the documents were subsequently released within eight months.
"mRNA Gene Therapy": While mRNA technology involves genetic instructions, it is legally and scientifically classified as a vaccine, not gene therapy. Regulatory agencies like the FDA and CDC distinguish mRNA vaccines because they do not enter the cell nucleus or alter a person's DNA.
2
