That is a sad commentary & rightfully so.
I was disappointed that there was no mention of the number of patients enrolled thus far. Seems telling as to where we are at. Not sure about the cost involved with additional sites. 5 should have provided a number of patients given the successes. A number the company would not mind sharing.
I would suggest that if the fish aren't biting setting out more poles is not cost efficient. Again, I share your frustration, but not with the company.
They seem to have a handle.
It has to be about doctors.
They will flood the golf courses tomorrow & this weekend. They will deliver their children to a fine private school. Their spouses will not be subjected to anything remedial or demanding to the point of bringing them outside a certain comfort zone & level of appreciation that builds the brand.
By all accounts I believe this to be "the hypocritic oath".
What they will not do in large is risk their lifestyle for one human life.
Insurance will not allow it. Hospitals will not allow it. The legal system will punish doctors via libel if they put it on the line for a patient & something they believe could help.
Unfortunately, doctors are being forced to wait for a death sentence before they can prescribe without fear of legal action. There should be a legal consequence for that. They will knowingly send folks to their deathbeds prescribing FDA approved medicines for sake of lifestyle rather than risking something that might save lives. It seems their altruistic values are mostly tied to the arts &the Church.
Many after receiving taxpayer funded educations.
The hypocritical oath.
There are many exceptions & why I think compassionate use is vital.
It is shameful that people will not be offered alternatives until patients are at deaths doorstep & leronlimab will have such a high hurdle because of it.
I am nothing special, ASK A DOC : What would you do, how far would you go, & what would you risk to save 1 life & schedule an appointment.
I was disappointed that there was no mention of the number of patients enrolled thus far. Seems telling as to where we are at. Not sure about the cost involved with additional sites. 5 should have provided a number of patients given the successes. A number the company would not mind sharing.
I would suggest that if the fish aren't biting setting out more poles is not cost efficient. Again, I share your frustration, but not with the company.
They seem to have a handle.
It has to be about doctors.
They will flood the golf courses tomorrow & this weekend. They will deliver their children to a fine private school. Their spouses will not be subjected to anything remedial or demanding to the point of bringing them outside a certain comfort zone & level of appreciation that builds the brand.
By all accounts I believe this to be "the hypocritic oath".
What they will not do in large is risk their lifestyle for one human life.
Insurance will not allow it. Hospitals will not allow it. The legal system will punish doctors via libel if they put it on the line for a patient & something they believe could help.
Unfortunately, doctors are being forced to wait for a death sentence before they can prescribe without fear of legal action. There should be a legal consequence for that. They will knowingly send folks to their deathbeds prescribing FDA approved medicines for sake of lifestyle rather than risking something that might save lives. It seems their altruistic values are mostly tied to the arts &the Church.
Many after receiving taxpayer funded educations.
The hypocritical oath.
There are many exceptions & why I think compassionate use is vital.
It is shameful that people will not be offered alternatives until patients are at deaths doorstep & leronlimab will have such a high hurdle because of it.
I am nothing special, ASK A DOC : What would you do, how far would you go, & what would you risk to save 1 life & schedule an appointment.
8
1
