Response to Post 167 – “When the System Watche
Post# of 223
(Total Views: 76)
Posted On: 07/15/2025 1:09:05 AM
Response to Post 167 – “When the System Watches Itself, It Panics.”
You’re not wrong. In fact, you just nailed the quiet part out loud:
• Jeff Murray and Patrizia Cavazzoni are no longer federal employees.
• Yet they accessed whistleblower-linked data.
• On a federal holiday.
• On my file.
• Before NIH even got to it.
Let that sink in.
That kind of access isn’t casual. It’s systemic. It’s either an inside handoff, or these former execs never actually left the chessboard. Either way, it confirms what I documented in Vault 2431:
“The Watchmen Watched the Watchman.”
You’re also dead-on about the NIH ping. My system flagged it too but the FDA accessed first. That wasn’t research. That was reaction. And it proves that the whistleblower system has been compromised, mirrored, or shared behind closed doors.
As for the old email threads where they mocked Lalezari’s cytokine data? I’ve archived those too. I named the pattern in Scroll 2571:
“They Watched a Man So Long, He Became a Department.”
I’ve become the system’s own audit trail because the internal watchdogs failed to bark. Now their silence is evidence.
Re: class action against Amarex
You’re right again. But here’s the buried horror:
A class action assumes it was incompetence. What if it was calculated negligence? What if patients weren’t just harmed but sacrificed to keep certain data buried?
That moves it from civil to criminal. From delay to blood.
This isn’t about CYDY anymore.
It’s about why the FDA, NIH, and whistleblower portals responded to one man’s uploads like a bomb had gone off.
And that bomb… is still ticking.
Peace—
But not quiet.
—The Watchman
You’re not wrong. In fact, you just nailed the quiet part out loud:
• Jeff Murray and Patrizia Cavazzoni are no longer federal employees.
• Yet they accessed whistleblower-linked data.
• On a federal holiday.
• On my file.
• Before NIH even got to it.
Let that sink in.
That kind of access isn’t casual. It’s systemic. It’s either an inside handoff, or these former execs never actually left the chessboard. Either way, it confirms what I documented in Vault 2431:
“The Watchmen Watched the Watchman.”
You’re also dead-on about the NIH ping. My system flagged it too but the FDA accessed first. That wasn’t research. That was reaction. And it proves that the whistleblower system has been compromised, mirrored, or shared behind closed doors.
As for the old email threads where they mocked Lalezari’s cytokine data? I’ve archived those too. I named the pattern in Scroll 2571:
“They Watched a Man So Long, He Became a Department.”
I’ve become the system’s own audit trail because the internal watchdogs failed to bark. Now their silence is evidence.
Re: class action against Amarex
You’re right again. But here’s the buried horror:
A class action assumes it was incompetence. What if it was calculated negligence? What if patients weren’t just harmed but sacrificed to keep certain data buried?
That moves it from civil to criminal. From delay to blood.
This isn’t about CYDY anymore.
It’s about why the FDA, NIH, and whistleblower portals responded to one man’s uploads like a bomb had gone off.
And that bomb… is still ticking.
Peace—
But not quiet.
—The Watchman
(1)
(0)