"...but that blows our entire budget for the year.
Post# of 153107
I kinda don't think if a legacy company offers us a very well rounded offer, it won't need to include billions up-front. Especially if we go with hub-n-spoke corp model
"....and if I were big Pharma, I put money on this horse."
Dam right.
They will never have a better calculated business risk, than the sum of all of Leronlimabs benefits.
Especially the huge advantage of 100% iP ownership.
In this case it would have to be ---
"internal bean counters be damed.
This LL opportunity is why we, as a company exist. Why the industry exists."
I agree with KC on no other reason to take legal overseas. We've had the mTNBC data for 11 months. Was asked to wait 3 months for a poster information. That was submitted...3 months ago.
That's the linchpen to me --- they didn't sit & do nothing beyond that poster for 3 months.
That's why i agree with KC's line of thought, but yours too of could still be a little longer. Because you both can be right for many reasons -- & all good reasons
Those confirmation results of LL / PD-L effect, are crucial to anything anyone says. Exciting expectations for me.
Results i been saying to myself....anyday.
Then, if even waiting like you're thinking, we're just strolling through the summer with relaxed confidence.
Man were those P-values just outstanding given all the crazy sources of data, formatting, getting to that point
We got this !!!

