Our object, IMO, is to show LL to be a CCR5 antagonist with little or no side effects. Trials might be involved or might be a Dr. JL personal connection, or might be just someone who reads Omh20 on this board, etc...
Therefore, there is no set time frame. The reason I find negative comments offensive is counter productive to our goal of getting LL known, counter productive to the "perceived value" and if it helps keep the share price down it's a real stupid move. The share price gives us more money to work with. I do not consider a low share price to be an existential threat, just a shoot yourself in foot move.
Plus, with Dr.JL taking on a new CRO and new people, just show me where the negativity is coming from, namely one piece of evidence that says we aren't moving forward. Why should I have to prove my positive outlook, which I am certain we can all agree hurts nobody, when some are taking negative shots based on nothing.
I have never seen a Mercedes salesman say, the next 18 months should be exciting, and if they do one might question if they aren't working for the another car manufacturer.
Therefore, there is no set time frame. The reason I find negative comments offensive is counter productive to our goal of getting LL known, counter productive to the "perceived value" and if it helps keep the share price down it's a real stupid move. The share price gives us more money to work with. I do not consider a low share price to be an existential threat, just a shoot yourself in foot move.
Plus, with Dr.JL taking on a new CRO and new people, just show me where the negativity is coming from, namely one piece of evidence that says we aren't moving forward. Why should I have to prove my positive outlook, which I am certain we can all agree hurts nobody, when some are taking negative shots based on nothing.
I have never seen a Mercedes salesman say, the next 18 months should be exciting, and if they do one might question if they aren't working for the another car manufacturer.
6
