Our object, IMO, is to show LL to be a CCR5 antago

Our object, IMO, is to show LL to be a CCR5 antagonist with little or no side effects. Trials might be involved or might be a Dr. JL personal connection, or might be just someone who reads Omh20 on this board, etc...

Therefore, there is no set time frame. The reason I find negative comments offensive is counter productive to our goal of getting LL known, counter productive to the "perceived value" and if it helps keep the share price down it's a real stupid move. The share price gives us more money to work with. I do not consider a low share price to be an existential threat, just a shoot yourself in foot move.

Plus, with Dr.JL taking on a new CRO and new people, just show me where the negativity is coming from, namely one piece of evidence that says we aren't moving forward. Why should I have to prove my positive outlook, which I am certain we can all agree hurts nobody, when some are taking negative shots based on nothing.

I have never seen a Mercedes salesman say, the next 18 months should be exciting, and if they do one might question if they aren't working for the another car manufacturer.