ROFLMAO! I suggest you go back and follow the t
Post# of 12408
I suggest you go back and follow the thread back to the original context of the conversation.
Do a little DD before jumping in the middle of a conversation to express your misguided conclusions.
You have such a habit of only telling part of the story.
The tread
By: ThreeEmInEn#11851
Re: drugmanrx #11849
Re: ThreeEmInEn #11847
Re: drugmanrx #11846
Re: ThreeEmInEn #11841
Re: drugmanrx #11837
Re: Wallstreet1234 #11820
Re: drugmanrx #11819
Re: Wallstreet1234 #11818
Re: drugmanrx #11815
Re: Wallstreet1234 #11801
Re: drugmanrx #11795
Post 11795
the orginal
Posted On: 10/29/2024 10:33:02 PM
Quote:
Posted By: drugmanrx
Let's look at SNPW as an investment.shall we.
In Dec 2020 the stock was trading around 0.002 presplit.
A run happen which lasted about 3 month where the stock ran to a high as 34.9 cents a share.
Now the "DD Team" claim the run was a fluke.
Ok say it was a fluke so if you took a chance in 2020 and the fluke never happen your investment would only be down 17%.
But the fluke did happen and you had a chance to walk away with over 1500% profit.
So when they say that the investment is down 95%, remember that they believe the run was a fluke so the position is only 17% down with less debt then it had in 2020 and a couple of partners (a subsidiary of s Fortune 500 company and Sun Group) now they didn't have then..
Why the constant need to deceive?
Your case just fell apart