Transparency and Snpw should not be mentioned in t
Post# of 12408
(Total Views: 86)
Posted On: 10/29/2024 11:58:41 AM
Transparency and Snpw should not be mentioned in the same sentence. IMHO
No 8-Ks within SEC required 5 days following material events to protect shareholders such as:
- ri transit contract termination
- Tallahassee Florida star metro contract termination
- howell nj contract termination
- medrecycler taken possession by ceo and removed from snpw as a subsidiary (never published)
- elba, al property purchase agreement expiration (showed up in a 10-q months later)
- cac realty loan to spp for sales and marketing agreement including spp owing the ceo’s side company cac realty 30% of profits and 12% interest (showed up in 10-q a few months later)
to mame just a few
in my opinion while “setting the record straight”
No 8-Ks within SEC required 5 days following material events to protect shareholders such as:
- ri transit contract termination
- Tallahassee Florida star metro contract termination
- howell nj contract termination
- medrecycler taken possession by ceo and removed from snpw as a subsidiary (never published)
- elba, al property purchase agreement expiration (showed up in a 10-q months later)
- cac realty loan to spp for sales and marketing agreement including spp owing the ceo’s side company cac realty 30% of profits and 12% interest (showed up in 10-q a few months later)
to mame just a few
in my opinion while “setting the record straight”
(0)
(0)Sun Pacific Holding Corp. (SNPW) Stock Research Links
Scroll down for more posts ▼