Interesting character druggie is I say that bec
Post# of 12408
I say that because, unlike, most others, hitting a supposed jackpot on an insolvent OTC stock’s fluke run, knowing some already published scrutiny about its ceo, and knowing only 2 employees, not having financial approval from state governmental authorities, nor public favoring, relating to an unknown and non-existent recycling technology, he appears to be looking for another very rare windfall, from the stock, backed by a very unsuccessful, still insolvent entity.
But, 3 1/2 years later, knowing the less than arms length relationship, he has established with this entity, still insolvent and still having 2 or less employees, it all makes sense why he would be the most avid supporter of of Snpw, throwing out tea leaf, after tea leaf, making the best out of every excuse for pivoting due to failures across every sector of the company.
Makes one “wonder” what if he hadn’t benefited from the company’s months of promoting its never seen before pyrolysis recycling technology.
Makes one “wonder” why the incessant need to try and protect the ceo from well-earned criticism for a variety of obvious reasons.
One may never know why, but it’s clear there was some allegiance and convenient timing associated with his initial decision, to buy a significant number of shares, years after the company had been in existence, One could say it was pure luck, but another could say it smells rotten.
Due to the decision to voluntarily post about emails and phone calls with the ceo, after the stock had lost 95% of its value, coupled with his decision to find his way to being approved with becoming a moderator of a second Snpw message board, fueling his initial biased treatment of snpw doubters, me think it smells rotten.
It will all make so much more sense, soon, when Karma returns from her due diligence mystery tour.
in my opinion while “setting the record straight”
cheers