Crazy 4000:1 R/S and wasn't even necessary at that
Post# of 12821
Recall those tweets when multiple R/S's were approved but not necessary (or possible) at that time?
Well, here's a sick R/S never heard of at 4000. And, now it's very evident, it wasn't even necessary in February 2024 (8 months later) but we have to read posts and tweets about "reassuring everyone that none of the shares have been used. All shares remain in tact with n dilution."
Just another bipolar tweet:
Quote:
"We completed a 4000-to-1 reverse split and want to reassure everyone that none of the shares have been used. All shares remain intact with no dilution. #ReverseSplit #Shareholders"
$SNPW
8:58 PM · Aug 4, 2024
in my opinion
cheers