" But I highly doubt that she will put the best in

" But I highly doubt that she will put the best interests of CYDY in terms of fundraising ahead of the profit motive for Paulson."

What does he have...50m shares?
I personally don't care.

This company is 1k % stronger than it's past.
She has to be given at least some credit....instead of guilt by association

Hell....if that was an only metric...you'd be guilty of associating with a horrible speller...

Right news & even 50m won't be close 1 full session of trading ....he's small potatoes now in the grand picture of all things going on....we're looking & immeasurable potential....I've questioned "needing" BP as our only funding....so I'm surely not worried about him

yes he is part of the original group who told ...u know who...they would always fund him as needed....turned into a shit show of greed....how do u go 7 yrs of HIV & no BLA filed...etc,,,etc...

But yea..."no" votes should always at least make the BOD talk....or who knows...maybe outta the blue She steps aside in a few months...."to pursue other interests"....not long after a deal. ...sp rises & no more drawing from the Cytodyn well for P & F. because now it actually trades.....sometimes a company will buy-out someone like those 2 too.....but with our pipeline....no need to....let'em get steam rolled into needing to honestly trade like everyone else....

If they are selling everyday....Our science will moot them 2 fellas

No worries on that from me