More on the Why aren't there more investors excit
Post# of 154595
(Total Views: 1023)
Posted On: 09/05/2024 4:37:31 PM
More on the Why aren't there more investors excited about CYDY? thread.
Probably a lot of you have had an experience like this: I tried to tell a friend that she should enroll in the TNBC trial. She asked her doc. He said as if he knew a single crap about it that Leron was an experimental drug and it had side effects. My saying IT DOESN'T HAVE SIDE EFFECTS was dismissed.
Or the attempt I made with Ohm's help to post an article on the Daily Kos about Leron. I used the word "miraculous," and that was enough to get the article deleted. The person who deleted it smugly congratulated himself for catching a fraud.
And what if he HAD tried to research it? He would have gotten, first of all, the safety hold and/or the public rebuke from the FDA. I've got a good friend who works for the NIH and he is quite sure that what the FDA says is reasoned, scientific, rationale. He thinks I'm being delusional when I say the FDA is definitely wrong and possibly corrupt. Why get excited about a drug that has failed a pair of Covid tests, been rebuked in its HIV application, been handed a years-long safety hold, and drawn a public letter from the FDA saying the drug just plain doesn't work in any indication and the company better not say it does.
The short version is that it is no wonder few people are on the bandwagon. The only wonder is that the FDA and mismanagement and malfeasance (by Amarex) hasn't sunk the company. For that we can thank a few people, like Scott and Jay, and all of the people like us -- who have hung on, and still hang on, in persistence and faith. Forgive the self-congratulations, but I'd guess there are 50 or 100 million shares in good hands, right here on this board.
There may not be justice or real progress in this world. But I hope there is. There might be.
Probably a lot of you have had an experience like this: I tried to tell a friend that she should enroll in the TNBC trial. She asked her doc. He said as if he knew a single crap about it that Leron was an experimental drug and it had side effects. My saying IT DOESN'T HAVE SIDE EFFECTS was dismissed.
Or the attempt I made with Ohm's help to post an article on the Daily Kos about Leron. I used the word "miraculous," and that was enough to get the article deleted. The person who deleted it smugly congratulated himself for catching a fraud.
And what if he HAD tried to research it? He would have gotten, first of all, the safety hold and/or the public rebuke from the FDA. I've got a good friend who works for the NIH and he is quite sure that what the FDA says is reasoned, scientific, rationale. He thinks I'm being delusional when I say the FDA is definitely wrong and possibly corrupt. Why get excited about a drug that has failed a pair of Covid tests, been rebuked in its HIV application, been handed a years-long safety hold, and drawn a public letter from the FDA saying the drug just plain doesn't work in any indication and the company better not say it does.
The short version is that it is no wonder few people are on the bandwagon. The only wonder is that the FDA and mismanagement and malfeasance (by Amarex) hasn't sunk the company. For that we can thank a few people, like Scott and Jay, and all of the people like us -- who have hung on, and still hang on, in persistence and faith. Forgive the self-congratulations, but I'd guess there are 50 or 100 million shares in good hands, right here on this board.
There may not be justice or real progress in this world. But I hope there is. There might be.
(40)
(0)