Investors Hangout Stock Message Boards Logo
  • Mailbox
  • Favorites
  • Boards
    • The Hangout
    • NASDAQ
    • NYSE
    • OTC Markets
    • All Boards
  • Whats Hot!
    • Recent Activity
    • Most Viewed Boards
    • Most Viewed Posts
    • Most Posted
    • Most Followed
    • Top Boards
    • Newest Boards
    • Newest Members
  • Blog
    • Recent Blog Posts
    • Recently Updated
    • News
    • Stocks
    • Crypto
    • Investing
    • Business
    • Markets
    • Economy
    • Real Estate
    • Personal Finance
  • Market Movers
  • Interactive Charts
  • Login - Join Now FREE!
  1. Home ›
  2. Stock Message Boards ›
  3. Stock Boards ›
  4. CytoDyn Inc (CYDY) Message Board

Hi Craig - Re: Statins / Cholesterol, Thanks fo

Message Board Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Replies (1)                   Post New Msg
Edit Msg () | Previous | Next


Post# of 154852
(Total Views: 713)
Posted On: 09/03/2024 11:30:53 PM
Avatar
Posted By: mightycydy
Hi Craig - Re: Statins / Cholesterol,

Thanks for your replies my friend. Here are some statin and cholesterol-related links that may be of interest. Please take a moment to read the following links with an open mind:

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/06...095006.htm

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1586/...15.1012494

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2824152/

https://www.westonaprice.org/health-topics/mo...#gsc.tab=0

https://www.uspharmacist.com/article/some-sta...ive-issues

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/07/well/live/...betes.html
(if the preceding NYTimes article entitled " Statins May Increase Risk of Diabetes " is behind a paywall, here's a link to the study that the article references: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30838685/ )

Craig - before you ad hominem attack Dr. Cate and the below links (sort of like how you attacked Dr. Sinatra by calling him a "nut job" rather than actually reading his bestselling book), it's worth noting that Dr. Cate (another bestselling author) was the nutritionist for the LA Lakers and also worked with Kobe Bryant one-on-one:

"“…We trust Dr. Cate implicitly...” –Kobe Bryant, LA Lakers"


https://drcate.com/cholesterol-pills-statins-...our-brain/

https://drcate.com/who-teaches-doctors-about-...ing-drugs/

https://drcate.com/cholesterol-what-the-ameri...ou-part-1/

https://drcate.com/cholesterol-what-the-ameri...ou-part-2/

https://drcate.com/cholesterol-what-the-ameri...ou-part-3/

...And now back to Leronlimab's potential role in fighting heart disease (vis-a-vis tamping down inflammation):

"It’s rampant inflammation that causes heart attacks, not high cholesterol,” says Ronesh Sinha, M.D., an internal medicine doctor at the Palo Alto Medical Foundation. “In fact, more than half of all heart attacks occur in people who have normal cholesterol levels. Many of those people were diligently taking their cholesterol medications, but still doing things that can contribute to inflammation, including eating the wrong foods, overstressing, sitting too much, and accumulating ever more belly fat.”

“If you want to keep your heart healthy and prevent a heart attack, you need to protect your arteries from inflammation,” he says.


Source: https://www.sutterhealth.org/health/heart/inf...rt-attacks

To read more about inflammation's role in heart disease, Google "heart disease inflammation".

Thanks again for your replies Craig. It's worth reiterating that calling Dr. Sinatra a "nut job" and trashing his bestselling book without reading it isn't the best way to make your point. Perhaps in the future you can refrain from utilizing the following (aforementioned) tactic:


Ad hominem (Latin for 'to the person'), short for argumentum ad hominem, refers to several types of arguments that are fallacious. Often nowadays this term refers to a rhetorical strategy where the speaker attacks the character, motive, or some other attribute of the person making an argument rather than the substance of the argument itself. This avoids genuine debate by creating a diversion often using a totally irrelevant, but often highly charged attribute of the opponent's character or background. The most common form of this fallacy is "A" makes a claim of "fact", to which "B" asserts that "A" has a personal trait, quality or physical attribute that is repugnant thereby going off-topic, and hence "B" concludes that "A" has their "fact" wrong - without ever addressing the point of the debate.

P.S. Regarding CYDY and Leronlimab... I remain... #BULLISH!


(15)
(0)




CytoDyn Inc (CYDY) Stock Research Links


  1.  
  2.  


  3.  
  4.  
  5.  






Investors Hangout

Home

Mailbox

Message Boards

Favorites

Whats Hot

Blog

Settings

Privacy Policy

Terms and Conditions

Disclaimer

Contact Us

Whats Hot

Recent Activity

Most Viewed Boards

Most Viewed Posts

Most Posted Boards

Most Followed

Top Boards

Newest Boards

Newest Members

Investors Hangout Message Boards

Welcome To Investors Hangout

Stock Message Boards

American Stock Exchange (AMEX)

NASDAQ Stock Exchange (NASDAQ)

New York Stock Exchange (NYSE)

Penny Stocks - (OTC)

User Boards

The Hangout

Private

Global Markets

Australian Securities Exchange (ASX)

Euronext Amsterdam (AMS)

Euronext Brussels (BRU)

Euronext Lisbon (LIS)

Euronext Paris (PAR)

Foreign Exchange (FOREX)

Hong Kong Stock Exchange (HKEX)

London Stock Exchange (LSE)

Milan Stock Exchange (MLSE)

New Zealand Exchange (NZX)

Singapore Stock Exchange (SGX)

Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX)

Contact Investors Hangout

Email Us

Follow Investors Hangout

Twitter

YouTube

Facebook

Market Data powered by QuoteMedia. Copyright © 2025. Data delayed 15 minutes unless otherwise indicated (view delay times for all exchanges).
Analyst Ratings & Earnings by Zacks. RT=Real-Time, EOD=End of Day, PD=Previous Day. Terms of Use.

© 2025 Copyright Investors Hangout, LLC All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Policy |Do Not Sell My Information | Terms & Conditions | Disclaimer | Help | Contact Us