if you only knew Druggman? maybe some know who
Post# of 10632
(Total Views: 100)
Posted On: 08/27/2024 11:10:36 AM
if you only knew Druggman?
maybe some know who "that" Mexican manufacturer was and the details surrounding not getting their money almost to the day the "defense production act" (NO HOARDING & PRICE GAUGING) was signed off by your favorite all-time president?
maybe there was only the opportunity to obtain masks, but they never did, by not being able to pay for them?
maybe there was a smaller mask (not n95's) for the Florida agency prior to the NYC order needed to fill?
can you imagine needing to use fake letterhead to get approved as a vendor (zero experience with PPE) to try facilitate a price-gauged order with NYC for millions of dollars? and being proven and stated in a federal complaint that someone (two people related) had a direct hand in that fraud?
doesn't that make an indirect support of fraud since you have never denied that fact and support the same person (people) in this public company endeavor? doesn't that tell us something about you? forget about trying peg me as some co-conspirator with little jimmy. I only agreed or disagreed with what he posted. I'm the only poster, besides you, that calls little jimmy out for his bullshit. that's far from a co-conspirator pal.
your threats, against myself or karma, as being some co-conspirator, related to any torturous interference, are very daring on your part. you should know karma would be the last person you and your buddy would want to get involved (accusations) with in any legal scenario. that would backfire horribly for some people. he knows it and you should know it. just saying, don't play games with me or karma by associating me or karma with anyone else's business. i have stayed out of little jimmy's game of some SEC investigation. maybe, you would like it to stay that way for your own and anyone else's sake?
karma was 100% certain the company was going to fail, for certain reasons, going back over 3 years ago. she's never been wrong for a reason. you have been clueless for years, touting predictions, about the company, across every project promotion involving hundreds of millions of $$. now, you're worried and only defense is some dangerous game of threatening posters with accusations of being a CC with tortuous interference.
anyways, karma appears to be done with her due diligence, in here and anywhere else, for a serious reason. don't become part of the reason.
maybe there are people, close to the company, that have more to worry about than being accused of tortuous interference. you don't know what you don't know even if you may have connections with some corporate attorney (see moss text). you only know what you hear.
and jimmy go #@%* yourself if you're reading this and plan on using it, again, as being your due diligence.
in my opinion
cheers
maybe some know who "that" Mexican manufacturer was and the details surrounding not getting their money almost to the day the "defense production act" (NO HOARDING & PRICE GAUGING) was signed off by your favorite all-time president?
maybe there was only the opportunity to obtain masks, but they never did, by not being able to pay for them?
maybe there was a smaller mask (not n95's) for the Florida agency prior to the NYC order needed to fill?
can you imagine needing to use fake letterhead to get approved as a vendor (zero experience with PPE) to try facilitate a price-gauged order with NYC for millions of dollars? and being proven and stated in a federal complaint that someone (two people related) had a direct hand in that fraud?
doesn't that make an indirect support of fraud since you have never denied that fact and support the same person (people) in this public company endeavor? doesn't that tell us something about you? forget about trying peg me as some co-conspirator with little jimmy. I only agreed or disagreed with what he posted. I'm the only poster, besides you, that calls little jimmy out for his bullshit. that's far from a co-conspirator pal.
your threats, against myself or karma, as being some co-conspirator, related to any torturous interference, are very daring on your part. you should know karma would be the last person you and your buddy would want to get involved (accusations) with in any legal scenario. that would backfire horribly for some people. he knows it and you should know it. just saying, don't play games with me or karma by associating me or karma with anyone else's business. i have stayed out of little jimmy's game of some SEC investigation. maybe, you would like it to stay that way for your own and anyone else's sake?
karma was 100% certain the company was going to fail, for certain reasons, going back over 3 years ago. she's never been wrong for a reason. you have been clueless for years, touting predictions, about the company, across every project promotion involving hundreds of millions of $$. now, you're worried and only defense is some dangerous game of threatening posters with accusations of being a CC with tortuous interference.
anyways, karma appears to be done with her due diligence, in here and anywhere else, for a serious reason. don't become part of the reason.
maybe there are people, close to the company, that have more to worry about than being accused of tortuous interference. you don't know what you don't know even if you may have connections with some corporate attorney (see moss text). you only know what you hear.
and jimmy go #@%* yourself if you're reading this and plan on using it, again, as being your due diligence.
in my opinion
cheers
(0)
(0)
