First Solar Inc. & SNPW When a product (a) is
Post# of 13709
(Total Views: 157)
Posted On: 06/26/2024 6:39:02 AM
First Solar Inc. & SNPW
When a product (a) is dependent on a consumer’s disposable income, the demand for that product decreases if this consumer’s disposable income decreases. If a product (b) is directly tied to the same consumer’s monthly fixed cost, then the demand for product (b) remains inelastic. Further, if the business cost of this product (b) is subsidized by low cost overseas business partners (due to low business cost of these business partners), then the “business entity” of this product (b) remains in business with a profit. Furthermore, government incentives such as grants, tax credits and job privileges decrease the business cost (& consumption cost) even more, which brings more profit for the business entity of this product (b). This business entity is SNPW. This confusing economic interpretation explains the prudent business dealings of a great business strategist Mr. Nicholas Campanella involving the U.S., Australia, China and Vietnam.
The stock prices of topnotch solar companies are out of reach for many investors who want to buy thousands of shares (quantity matters). It’s anybody’s guess whether SNPW will ever reach where First Solar is at the moment. However, SNPW has the potential to reach the status of First Solar mainly because of a CEO who never gives up and a perfect match between Mr. Nicholas Campanella’s business model & strategy (Read above paragraph) and the information written in the following articles, which were posted by jk1:
https://www.governorsbiofuelscoalition.org/th...ergy-boom/
https://www.cnbc.com/2024/06/19/solar-is-grow...nters.html
https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/us-so...024-06-06/
The U.S. & Australian governments are spending billions and billions of $. Hope this helps!
When a product (a) is dependent on a consumer’s disposable income, the demand for that product decreases if this consumer’s disposable income decreases. If a product (b) is directly tied to the same consumer’s monthly fixed cost, then the demand for product (b) remains inelastic. Further, if the business cost of this product (b) is subsidized by low cost overseas business partners (due to low business cost of these business partners), then the “business entity” of this product (b) remains in business with a profit. Furthermore, government incentives such as grants, tax credits and job privileges decrease the business cost (& consumption cost) even more, which brings more profit for the business entity of this product (b). This business entity is SNPW. This confusing economic interpretation explains the prudent business dealings of a great business strategist Mr. Nicholas Campanella involving the U.S., Australia, China and Vietnam.
The stock prices of topnotch solar companies are out of reach for many investors who want to buy thousands of shares (quantity matters). It’s anybody’s guess whether SNPW will ever reach where First Solar is at the moment. However, SNPW has the potential to reach the status of First Solar mainly because of a CEO who never gives up and a perfect match between Mr. Nicholas Campanella’s business model & strategy (Read above paragraph) and the information written in the following articles, which were posted by jk1:
https://www.governorsbiofuelscoalition.org/th...ergy-boom/
https://www.cnbc.com/2024/06/19/solar-is-grow...nters.html
https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/us-so...024-06-06/
The U.S. & Australian governments are spending billions and billions of $. Hope this helps!
(1)
(0)