Investors Hangout Stock Message Boards Logo
  • Mailbox
  • Favorites
  • Boards
    • The Hangout
    • NASDAQ
    • NYSE
    • OTC Markets
    • All Boards
  • Whats Hot!
    • Recent Activity
    • Most Viewed Boards
    • Most Viewed Posts
    • Most Posted
    • Most Followed
    • Top Boards
    • Newest Boards
    • Newest Members
  • Blog
    • Recent Blog Posts
    • Recently Updated
    • News
    • Stocks
    • Crypto
    • Investing
    • Business
    • Markets
    • Economy
    • Real Estate
    • Personal Finance
  • Market Movers
  • Interactive Charts
  • Login - Join Now FREE!
  1. Home ›
  2. Stock Message Boards ›
  3. Stock Boards ›
  4. Nanologix Inc (NNLX) Message Board

thomas wants shareholder meeting so he can take ov

Message Board Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Replies (2)                   Post New Msg
Edit Msg () | Previous | Next


Post# of 9144
(Total Views: 879)
Posted On: 06/19/2024 8:39:03 AM
Avatar
Posted By: microcaps
Re: Becky HE #9100
thomas wants shareholder meeting so he can take over NNLX at such meeting--he apparently bought a lot of stock after the damage had already been done(his 1st complaint)

he is proposing a stock redo in which broker would have 15%, existing nnlx holders 25%-- and thomas would thus have 60% of stock by default

does not sound like current share structure would be used - nnlx holders might be compensated on a partial value basis for new stock- so current nnlx holders might receive far fewer shares than we now own but new shares would be worth more than the old shares worth at some point in past some years-or some other arrangement

its an ambitious scheme which remains to be seen- several steps would have to occur 1st- including avoiding a summary judgment on existing NNLX behalf and obtaining standing (right to sue NNLX)

THE PROPER VENUE is usually in the state and area where the company was located( Ohio) and doing business(out of Ohio)
thomas argues modern faxes etc trump the old rules of venue and thus would allow New Jersey court location-I've never seen this argument win out yet in cases I've been aware of

our emergency room dr will probably have to answer brets health questions

under most homestead rules one is allowed to keep their primary residence - but one can lose their house for back taxes -just as the IRS was often used to scare the mob

from public info it appears Bret has no money but his lawyer brothers must have money


(1)
(0)




Nanologix Inc (NNLX) Stock Research Links


  1.  
  2.  


  3.  
  4.  
  5.  






Investors Hangout

Home

Mailbox

Message Boards

Favorites

Whats Hot

Blog

Settings

Privacy Policy

Terms and Conditions

Disclaimer

Contact Us

Whats Hot

Recent Activity

Most Viewed Boards

Most Viewed Posts

Most Posted Boards

Most Followed

Top Boards

Newest Boards

Newest Members

Investors Hangout Message Boards

Welcome To Investors Hangout

Stock Message Boards

American Stock Exchange (AMEX)

NASDAQ Stock Exchange (NASDAQ)

New York Stock Exchange (NYSE)

Penny Stocks - (OTC)

User Boards

The Hangout

Private

Global Markets

Australian Securities Exchange (ASX)

Euronext Amsterdam (AMS)

Euronext Brussels (BRU)

Euronext Lisbon (LIS)

Euronext Paris (PAR)

Foreign Exchange (FOREX)

Hong Kong Stock Exchange (HKEX)

London Stock Exchange (LSE)

Milan Stock Exchange (MLSE)

New Zealand Exchange (NZX)

Singapore Stock Exchange (SGX)

Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX)

Contact Investors Hangout

Email Us

Follow Investors Hangout

Twitter

YouTube

Facebook

Market Data powered by QuoteMedia. Copyright © 2025. Data delayed 15 minutes unless otherwise indicated (view delay times for all exchanges).
Analyst Ratings & Earnings by Zacks. RT=Real-Time, EOD=End of Day, PD=Previous Day. Terms of Use.

© 2025 Copyright Investors Hangout, LLC All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Policy |Do Not Sell My Information | Terms & Conditions | Disclaimer | Help | Contact Us