Not sure why a certain someone would somehow inser
Post# of 13555
(Total Views: 173)
Posted On: 06/13/2024 5:44:49 PM
Re: DakotaSentMe #8945
Not sure why a certain someone would somehow insert (or get inserted) herself into things like a 3M n95 mask scandal and a cannabis license shakedown? But the certain someone’s name has popped up related to some scrupulous articles. Things must have been slow at EZEWARM during those gigs.
No disrespect, but what an embarrassing situation unless it’s a 2 peas in a pod thing. It used to be opposites attract.
At any rate, it does take a graphic arts background to do a decent job with photoshopping. It might be worthwhile to review many images tweeted over the years. After all, most may have missed some added or subtracted content from the same images on Twitter over the same years. Who knows it could be worth a look after this past January site visit photos on certain social media pages.
IMO, It’s always best to not bring a naive and influenced sidekick into the crux of the situation. It’s the pros that deserve the most attention. That’s where the due diligence needs to be done.
Some complex due diligence stuff in the cue. Recall the Miami hedge fund mentioned but not named in the SDNY federal complaint? Then that Mexico mask manufacturer? Then recall the Miami area character/conspirator’s cell phone pings mentioned?
Anyhoo, how does druggy make the SolRay online employment ads square peg fit into a SPP/GEP U.S. exclusive sales agreement round hole. After all sounds like interference on the part of Snpw ceo also being the ceo of SolRay??? That doesn’t help SPP does it? There’s a word “fiduciary” that had a real definition for the purposes in protecting shareholders of a public company.
Oh lordy, how the sh&t just keeps falling out if the sky.
in my opinion
cheers
No disrespect, but what an embarrassing situation unless it’s a 2 peas in a pod thing. It used to be opposites attract.
At any rate, it does take a graphic arts background to do a decent job with photoshopping. It might be worthwhile to review many images tweeted over the years. After all, most may have missed some added or subtracted content from the same images on Twitter over the same years. Who knows it could be worth a look after this past January site visit photos on certain social media pages.
IMO, It’s always best to not bring a naive and influenced sidekick into the crux of the situation. It’s the pros that deserve the most attention. That’s where the due diligence needs to be done.
Some complex due diligence stuff in the cue. Recall the Miami hedge fund mentioned but not named in the SDNY federal complaint? Then that Mexico mask manufacturer? Then recall the Miami area character/conspirator’s cell phone pings mentioned?
Anyhoo, how does druggy make the SolRay online employment ads square peg fit into a SPP/GEP U.S. exclusive sales agreement round hole. After all sounds like interference on the part of Snpw ceo also being the ceo of SolRay??? That doesn’t help SPP does it? There’s a word “fiduciary” that had a real definition for the purposes in protecting shareholders of a public company.
Oh lordy, how the sh&t just keeps falling out if the sky.
in my opinion
cheers
(0)
(0)