Investors Hangout Stock Message Boards Logo
  • Mailbox
  • Favorites
  • Boards
    • The Hangout
    • NASDAQ
    • NYSE
    • OTC Markets
    • All Boards
  • Whats Hot!
    • Recent Activity
    • Most Viewed Boards
    • Most Viewed Posts
    • Most Posted
    • Most Followed
    • Top Boards
    • Newest Boards
    • Newest Members
  • Blog
    • Recent Blog Posts
    • Recently Updated
    • News
    • Stocks
    • Crypto
    • Investing
    • Business
    • Markets
    • Economy
    • Real Estate
    • Personal Finance
  • Market Movers
  • Interactive Charts
  • Login - Join Now FREE!
  1. Home ›
  2. Stock Message Boards ›
  3. Stock Boards ›
  4. CytoDyn Inc (CYDY) Message Board

I received a PM and was urged by the sender to pos

Message Board Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Replies (2)                   Post New Msg
Edit Msg () | Previous | Next


Post# of 155062
(Total Views: 829)
Posted On: 06/02/2024 3:44:09 PM
Posted By: ohm20
I received a PM and was urged by the sender to post his query and my reply on the public board.

Quote:
I assume that the LL regulation list is the foundation for the disease list. But what is the source/foundation for the regulation list? You obviously had to have had something to work with that permitted you to gain such insights regarding the MOA of a particular drug. Perhaps you have already discussed this long ago in other posts. If so, I apologize, but it strikes me that now might be a good time for you to post (or remind us), in as elementary a manner as possible, regarding the source materials that have allowed you, through your own meticulous methods, to generate the regulation list.

And perhaps also address whether you believe it likely that appropriately trained employees at CYDY and BP companies would have conducted a similar analysis of LL.



Quote:
I assume that the LL regulation list is the foundation for the disease list.
Quote:
The disease list came first and I was keeping track of what leronlimab was regulating in my head but it was becoming a bit unwieldy so I decided to write them down. The list is only a fraction of what leronlimab regulates. At one time I thought of tracking down the complete pathways of everything connected to CCR5 but that could take a couple of years.




Quote:
But what is the source/foundation for the regulation list? You obviously had to have had something to work with that permitted you to gain such insights regarding the MOA of a particular drug.
Quote:
The source was reading thousands upon thousands of medical white papers and study and trial results. Luckily I can be single-minded when I want to know something, time on my hands and a bit of insomnia.]




Quote:
If so, I apologize, but it strikes me that now might be a good time for you to post (or remind us), in as elementary a manner as possible, regarding the source materials that have allowed you, through your own meticulous methods, to generate the regulation list.
Quote:
I would have to go back and track down all of those papers and quote cites. It's the only way to do it right. That would be massively time consuming and I would rather spend my time on something else.

This all started out in 2019 with me wanting to know how good leronlimab actually was in HIV before I invested. Then I decided to look at cancer since it seemed odd to me at the time that an HIV drug would work in it. Which led me down a very deep rabbit hole of how the CCR5 receptor actually worked and what leronlimab was capable of.




Anyone here could learn the same thing if they had too much time on their own hands.

Quote:
And perhaps also address whether you believe it likely that appropriately trained employees at CYDY and BP companies would have conducted a similar analysis of LL.
Quote:
Most of those employees professional lives are involved in their own little niches that do not involve CCR5. The only ones that probably have decent knowledge would be the maraviroc team at Pfizer and they might not realize that leronlimab is much better than maraviroc. There have been a large amount of studies and trials involving maraviroc but Pfizer doesn't seem to be seriously following up on indications. Possibly because of the liver toxicity or maybe because maraviroc sales in HIV are awful.






(29)
(0)




CytoDyn Inc (CYDY) Stock Research Links


  1.  
  2.  


  3.  
  4.  
  5.  






Investors Hangout

Home

Mailbox

Message Boards

Favorites

Whats Hot

Blog

Settings

Privacy Policy

Terms and Conditions

Disclaimer

Contact Us

Whats Hot

Recent Activity

Most Viewed Boards

Most Viewed Posts

Most Posted Boards

Most Followed

Top Boards

Newest Boards

Newest Members

Investors Hangout Message Boards

Welcome To Investors Hangout

Stock Message Boards

American Stock Exchange (AMEX)

NASDAQ Stock Exchange (NASDAQ)

New York Stock Exchange (NYSE)

Penny Stocks - (OTC)

User Boards

The Hangout

Private

Global Markets

Australian Securities Exchange (ASX)

Euronext Amsterdam (AMS)

Euronext Brussels (BRU)

Euronext Lisbon (LIS)

Euronext Paris (PAR)

Foreign Exchange (FOREX)

Hong Kong Stock Exchange (HKEX)

London Stock Exchange (LSE)

Milan Stock Exchange (MLSE)

New Zealand Exchange (NZX)

Singapore Stock Exchange (SGX)

Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX)

Contact Investors Hangout

Email Us

Follow Investors Hangout

Twitter

YouTube

Facebook

Market Data powered by QuoteMedia. Copyright © 2025. Data delayed 15 minutes unless otherwise indicated (view delay times for all exchanges).
Analyst Ratings & Earnings by Zacks. RT=Real-Time, EOD=End of Day, PD=Previous Day. Terms of Use.

© 2025 Copyright Investors Hangout, LLC All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Policy |Do Not Sell My Information | Terms & Conditions | Disclaimer | Help | Contact Us