>>468462089 Trusting the plan? Enjoying the

>>468462089
Trusting the plan?
Enjoying the show?
Ready for the finale?
Saving Israel for last.
Two more weeks.
Q



>>468483152
>Two more weeks.
that was covid, which Q exposed in real time, down to teaching us how to tell true death levels via excess deaths, using that mechanism we absolutely established it was a spreadsheet illness being attributed with deaths from democide via lockdowns.


>>468483388
Don't try and trick me. Two more weeks posting came from Q. Two more weeks until Hillary Clinton would be arrested and executed at gitmo, etc


>>468484053
>This should happen more often.
There's a couple issues that APPEAR as though we need to devote more time to because there is an apparent lack of consensus.
I would put the following subjects in this category:
-Andrew Tate
-Q
-Flat earth

but once you understand the ROLE of the bots, the apparent discord on these topics is actually absolute proof that nearly all of organic /pol/ is properly onboard and in virtual consensus on those topics.
You see, bots aren't really to convince us that we're wrong, but rather to create evidence for the unstated claim that there exists no consensus on those topics.
Group decision making is a kind of threshold followed by cascade effect. At some point, organically, one side or the other will gain some level of consensus, when this happens, all the disengaged retards understand the consensus and adhere to it. So this is how support by 30% of the population that's actually engaged in politics, can translate into near universal support. THIS is what bots are designed to prevent by hoaxing consensus.
So naturally, if you can measure the level of botting on any topic, the MORE a topic is botted, the MORE dangerous it is to them, and the more willing they are to spend resources to hoax a lack of consensus.
If you start any thread about the topics mentioned above, you'll have nearly instantaneous bots show up to tip the favor into there being no consensus. Which means that absent those bots, /pol/ would appear to have consensus on those topics.

tldr; organic /pol/ is fully red pilled on Q, Tate and Flat Earth, and supports them all. The opposition we see is entirely botted and proves the actual underlying organic support (because it wouldn't exist if there was a genuine lack of consensus).



tell me
have they had a single positive news cycle since 'Biden' was 'inaugurated'?
Total lapdog media
Total capture of the institutions
why can't they get a single good news cycle? in 3 years not one day of good news?
they aren't in charge anymore
enjoy the show




>>468458718 (OP)
Because it was wrong about literally everything and clearly an established mossad psyop to keep Trump supporters from holding his feet to the fire and doing anything useful.