Thanks, jfl97z. I have a few questions and commen
Post# of 153880
(Total Views: 900)
Posted On: 05/10/2024 9:32:09 AM
Thanks, jfl97z. I have a few questions and comments about the allegations against NP:
That NP said, and did, many, many stupid things isn’t up for debate. Nor are KK’s blunders and failures to live up to contractual agreements. I agree NP tried, and many times succeeded, in helping patients get access to LL which consequently saved their lives but that speaks nothing to the allegations that the DOJ has accused him of.
Butt, were you around in the Spring of 2020 when NP pumped up the stock price (and the excitement of investors like me) by saying that the BLA had been submitted? The allegations are that he knew the BLA was incomplete yet requested that it be submitted and this was timed perfectly just before he sold his shares.
Allegedly selling shares at great profit, while withholding information to shareholders that the BLA was incomplete, after just insinuating to shareholders that the BLA was complete and submitted to the FDA, is the crux of the DOJ’s case. It is standard Industry practice (extremely basic) that you don’t knowingly submit incomplete sections of a BLA, much less an entire BLA that is incomplete to the FDA; that is what questions directed to the FDA are for. Go back and read NP’s words. He knew the BLA he submitted was incomplete. NP ALSO claimed Scott Kelly sold shares at the same time, but we have seen no proof of it. If you have this evidence, please direct me to it.
So, I am curious where in the DOJ’s findings you see evidence that NP did not violate the law? I am not talking about emotional things like, “he’s a nice guy, he didn’t mean to harm, he saved lives…”. I’d like your take on how you view NP not having broken any laws.
ignorantia juris non excusat (Ignorance of the law excuses not)
Thanks, and I look forward to your response.
That NP said, and did, many, many stupid things isn’t up for debate. Nor are KK’s blunders and failures to live up to contractual agreements. I agree NP tried, and many times succeeded, in helping patients get access to LL which consequently saved their lives but that speaks nothing to the allegations that the DOJ has accused him of.
Butt, were you around in the Spring of 2020 when NP pumped up the stock price (and the excitement of investors like me) by saying that the BLA had been submitted? The allegations are that he knew the BLA was incomplete yet requested that it be submitted and this was timed perfectly just before he sold his shares.
Allegedly selling shares at great profit, while withholding information to shareholders that the BLA was incomplete, after just insinuating to shareholders that the BLA was complete and submitted to the FDA, is the crux of the DOJ’s case. It is standard Industry practice (extremely basic) that you don’t knowingly submit incomplete sections of a BLA, much less an entire BLA that is incomplete to the FDA; that is what questions directed to the FDA are for. Go back and read NP’s words. He knew the BLA he submitted was incomplete. NP ALSO claimed Scott Kelly sold shares at the same time, but we have seen no proof of it. If you have this evidence, please direct me to it.
So, I am curious where in the DOJ’s findings you see evidence that NP did not violate the law? I am not talking about emotional things like, “he’s a nice guy, he didn’t mean to harm, he saved lives…”. I’d like your take on how you view NP not having broken any laws.
ignorantia juris non excusat (Ignorance of the law excuses not)
Thanks, and I look forward to your response.
(14)
(0)