Do enlighten us all what the supposed Concurrent C
Post# of 12554
(Total Views: 222)
Posted On: 05/08/2024 9:14:18 AM
Re: ThreeEmInEn #7699
Do enlighten us all what the supposed Concurrent Conflict Of Interest (CCOI) is between SNPW and Solray taking into full account the legal definition of what a CCOI is???
IF there is none (clearly there is none to date) that contravenes RPC 1.7. Conflict of Interest: General Rule, your narrative self destructs, and miserably so to boot.
Did to you exactly what ye eejits do to us actual shareholders everyday, ie use sneaky tactics meant to confuse the reader.......no fun when yer the target innit!!!
Go back to post #7694 and take special note of exception (3)........I even underlined, highlighted and added my comment (in Bold Black) it to make it more obvious for ye, but alas!
(3) the representation is not prohibited by law; and (it wont be IF the consultation is regarding a Merger or mutually beneficial business combination between SNPW and Solray)
What's the LAW?......A lawyer cannot represent parties where there is a CCOI except if Four (4) conditions are met, but with SNPW being a Pubco, such an occurrence is arguably not allowed despite the (4) exceptions.
The problem for ye is that as I subtly indicated in exception (3)....if there is no CCOI, RPC 1.7 DOES NOT APPLY, it becomes legally moot, and as such Mr Eilers is unfettered to represent both SNPW and Solray to facilitate what clearly appears to be a potential Merger/Acquisition arrangement.
Hint: Both SNPW and Solray are lead by the same Management and to date are NOT competitors in the "Green Economy"
Now scurry back to yer Colouring Book Muppet and start "drawing" up the next faux narrative using Crayons. lololsss
IF there is none (clearly there is none to date) that contravenes RPC 1.7. Conflict of Interest: General Rule, your narrative self destructs, and miserably so to boot.
Did to you exactly what ye eejits do to us actual shareholders everyday, ie use sneaky tactics meant to confuse the reader.......no fun when yer the target innit!!!
Go back to post #7694 and take special note of exception (3)........I even underlined, highlighted and added my comment (in Bold Black) it to make it more obvious for ye, but alas!
(3) the representation is not prohibited by law; and (it wont be IF the consultation is regarding a Merger or mutually beneficial business combination between SNPW and Solray)
What's the LAW?......A lawyer cannot represent parties where there is a CCOI except if Four (4) conditions are met, but with SNPW being a Pubco, such an occurrence is arguably not allowed despite the (4) exceptions.
The problem for ye is that as I subtly indicated in exception (3)....if there is no CCOI, RPC 1.7 DOES NOT APPLY, it becomes legally moot, and as such Mr Eilers is unfettered to represent both SNPW and Solray to facilitate what clearly appears to be a potential Merger/Acquisition arrangement.
Hint: Both SNPW and Solray are lead by the same Management and to date are NOT competitors in the "Green Economy"
Now scurry back to yer Colouring Book Muppet and start "drawing" up the next faux narrative using Crayons. lololsss
(0)
(0)Sun Pacific Holding Corp. (SNPW) Stock Research Links
Scroll down for more posts ▼