Keep doubling down on yer idiocy ......the text is
Post# of 13555
(Total Views: 140)
Posted On: 05/07/2024 5:12:06 PM
Re: ThreeEmInEn #7695
Keep doubling down on yer idiocy ......the text is right there for all NON FRAUDS to read and comprehend!
The problem for ye bunch of liars is that yer getting desperate hence the constant straw grasping and fabricating of asinine narratives. lololsss
The fact that SNPW ""cannot consent"" DOES NOT prohibit the Lawyer from consulting for both parties once the legal requirements are met......learn to read and comprehend.
CONCURRENT CONFLICT OF INTEREST (COI):
The lawyer may not represent a client if there is a concurrent conflict of interest, which means that the representation of one client will be directly adverse to another client; or there is a significant risk that the lawyer will materially limit his responsibilities to a client based on his representation of another client. Rule 1.7
The whole basis of yer argument rests solely on there being a material COI......IF the representation is for the clear mutual benefit of both SNPW and Solray re a Merger then your citing this issue becomes totally moot,
You lose again. lololsss
The problem for ye bunch of liars is that yer getting desperate hence the constant straw grasping and fabricating of asinine narratives. lololsss
The fact that SNPW ""cannot consent"" DOES NOT prohibit the Lawyer from consulting for both parties once the legal requirements are met......learn to read and comprehend.
CONCURRENT CONFLICT OF INTEREST (COI):
The lawyer may not represent a client if there is a concurrent conflict of interest, which means that the representation of one client will be directly adverse to another client; or there is a significant risk that the lawyer will materially limit his responsibilities to a client based on his representation of another client. Rule 1.7
The whole basis of yer argument rests solely on there being a material COI......IF the representation is for the clear mutual benefit of both SNPW and Solray re a Merger then your citing this issue becomes totally moot,
You lose again. lololsss
(0)
(0)