anyone see a problem with this photo? https://m
Post# of 13557
(Total Views: 133)
Posted On: 05/07/2024 2:16:37 PM
anyone see a problem with this photo?
https://media.licdn.com/dms/image/D4E22AQF9Zk...n_BYrCwnaY
Oh boy!!!
these photos "could" be the end-all for the con-man.
it appears desperation was at it's all time high in December 2023 and January 2023, coming off the photo-ops from China in November 2023. you know why? because the ceo was setting up his new competitive side company (as ceo), Solray, in late November 2023, with its state of south carolina business registration and Solray's website, SRNRG.com registration.
but, nobody knew about those events did they? why is that? because behind the scenes it appears to be about keeping the shareholders in the dark for months with NO 8-ks filed. wonder how that affects Snpw's attorney on file with his mug included in the list of Solray team members?
maybe read the New Jersey and South Carolina laws when it comes to legal representation with respect to public companies. all it might take is to show receipt of payment for legal services, to the same attorney, from both Snpw and Solray, Inc., without any disclosure made by Snpw.
No disclosure, but published in public domain.
The client is the shareholders of Snpw.
Karma has even more interesting stuff on this coming this evening.
Remember, from the information published in the public domain (SRNRG.com) Snpw corporate attorney must have known that Snpw ceo entered into a business transaction with a client and knowingly acquired an ownership (see South Carolina 100 shares filing), possessory, security or other pecuniary interest adverse to a client unless:
"adverse to a client"? could a client include Foxess customer base or GEP Vietnam prospective customers needing solar panels, distribution or installation? Partners must be so excited about their partnerships with Sun Pacific Power. Lmao!
BIG PROBLEMS!
in my opinion
cheers
https://media.licdn.com/dms/image/D4E22AQF9Zk...n_BYrCwnaY
Oh boy!!!
these photos "could" be the end-all for the con-man.
it appears desperation was at it's all time high in December 2023 and January 2023, coming off the photo-ops from China in November 2023. you know why? because the ceo was setting up his new competitive side company (as ceo), Solray, in late November 2023, with its state of south carolina business registration and Solray's website, SRNRG.com registration.
but, nobody knew about those events did they? why is that? because behind the scenes it appears to be about keeping the shareholders in the dark for months with NO 8-ks filed. wonder how that affects Snpw's attorney on file with his mug included in the list of Solray team members?
maybe read the New Jersey and South Carolina laws when it comes to legal representation with respect to public companies. all it might take is to show receipt of payment for legal services, to the same attorney, from both Snpw and Solray, Inc., without any disclosure made by Snpw.
Quote:
Although most ethics rules seem to permit the representation of both sides with the proper disclosure and client consent, it is always risky from a malpractice liability standpoint and should be avoided.
No disclosure, but published in public domain.
Quote:
(a) A lawyer shall not enter into a business transaction with a client or knowingly acquire an ownership, possessory, security or other pecuniary interest adverse to a client unless:
(1) the transaction and terms in which the lawyer acquires the interest are fair and reasonable to the client and are fully disclosed and transmitted in writing to the client in a manner that can be understood by the client;
The client is the shareholders of Snpw.
Karma has even more interesting stuff on this coming this evening.
Remember, from the information published in the public domain (SRNRG.com) Snpw corporate attorney must have known that Snpw ceo entered into a business transaction with a client and knowingly acquired an ownership (see South Carolina 100 shares filing), possessory, security or other pecuniary interest adverse to a client unless:
"adverse to a client"? could a client include Foxess customer base or GEP Vietnam prospective customers needing solar panels, distribution or installation? Partners must be so excited about their partnerships with Sun Pacific Power. Lmao!
BIG PROBLEMS!
in my opinion
cheers
(0)
(0)