Reply to John1234: Acid Rain is another proba

Reply to John1234:

Acid Rain is another probable hoax that has been shelved in favor of the newer, shinier hoaxes IMO. I don't mean that SO2, SO3 and NOX etc. do not acidify rain, but that the ongoing atmospheric aerosol injection programs (denied by folks with neck tilt impairment) are going to trump, or are trumping, all supposed effects of sulfur and nitrogen surface emissions combined, ex-bunker high sulfur fuel burning transoceanic shipping. (The localized damage from acid rain near industry would only confuse the peasants being subjected to planetwide terraforming, so it had to be retired).

Of course, we have no idea what the current crop of up and coming Satanists are planning for their next act, but they are clearing their throats on employing all the sulphur removed from FF's and stored near refineries across the world during the last 60 years for their terraforming plans going forward. We know they are likely going to use this source of radioactive sulfur because it is the only cheap, available source of sulfur large enough to fill their "needs".

We could argue that many chemtrails are chiefly coal fly ash (graphene and buckyballs plus a witches brew of metals like sulfur, mercury, fluoride and other elements in bituminous and anthracitic deposits), but we don't have any numbers on this because of the almost total information embargo by whoever is running the ongoing Terraforming Operation. So we don't know how much Sulphur is currently raining down on us. Instead we are fed on sporadic diet of citizen journalism about Aluminum, Barium and Strontium. Not that they AREN'T spraying us with radionuclides from reactor waste (which would be right up "their" alley), but any academic investigation runs into the of political impedimenta of a whole industry (chemtrailing) that is de facto invisible to any "investigator" in the accepted sense of that term. There are no "investigations" into this aspect of MIC climate modification, just as, after 1920, despite "investigators" proved that you could not transmit "infuenza" by siphoning fresh snot from a sick patient into a healthy subject, by repeating the procedure thousands of times with ZERO transmission, the theory of contagion gained total dominance of the medical profession anyway.

Climate "science" as popularly understood is effectively nonexistent, since sufficiently accurate data inputs cannot be ascertained, and the amount of time this has been true is nearing the 40 year mark. We have also learned by extension, that climate "computer modeling" is junk science, by the tacit admission of those designing and utilizing it.

Professional scientific investigators today are mostly acolytes, sycophants, and nepotists, feeding of the dead carcass of a system that has not dared to rely on the scientific method to guide it's trajectory in over 100 years. That is why we are where we are today.

Specifically to your point though: acid rain may dissolve carbonates in bedrock and so be neutralized (in pH) leading to less problems in some places, or over time. Acid rain might be neutralized by CaCO3 from diatom skeletons in ocean water, who knows? I agree: volcanism must periodically acid shock the biosphere, as you say!

I'm not saying this to deny anthropogenic acidification or it's dangers. I'm saying we can't know as long as the 800lb gorilla is sitting in the middle of the polite conversation we used to call science. That tradition has been sacrificed to some unknown minatory god we can all feel now, leering at us from the shadows. Good Luck ro All.