The twins you're referring to, Lulu and Nana, were
Post# of 148110
The use of CRISPR-Cas9 in this case was widely criticized for several reasons:
Lack of Transparency: He Jiankui's work was not conducted transparently, and it was revealed that the participants in the study were not adequately informed of the risks involved.
Ethical Concerns: Editing the human germline (cells that can be passed on to future generations) raises profound ethical questions, as any unintended consequences or off-target effects could be inherited by future generations.
Safety Concerns: The long-term effects and potential unintended consequences of gene editing in humans are still largely unknown. CRISPR technology is still in its early stages, and there is a risk of unintended genetic mutations or other adverse effects.
Following the revelation of his work, He Jiankui faced widespread criticism and was reportedly placed under investigation by Chinese authorities. The incident prompted calls for stricter regulations and oversight of gene editing research, particularly in the context of human germline editing. The case of Lulu and Nana serves as a cautionary tale regarding the ethical, social, and scientific complexities surrounding the use of gene editing technology in humans.