Ken, I'm not sure your explanation of the low bar
Post# of 155051
(Total Views: 670)
Posted On: 12/15/2023 5:33:56 PM
Re: KenChowder #140020
Ken, I'm not sure your explanation of the low bar for glioblastoma treatment is making sense to everyone. I don't think they get just how mediocre that definition of success is. Let me put it into terms the board may be better suited to understand.
The bar for glioblastoma is so low
(how low is it?)
The bar for glioblastoma is so low that if the same standard was applied to this board, Hulk could get his posts qualified as positive or even optimistic.
The bar for glioblastoma is so low that if the same standard was applied to this board, Jlang could tout his scientific acumen.
The bar for glioblastoma is so low that if the same standard was applied to this board, Craig would have a participation trophy for his cubby.
The bar for glioblastoma is so low that if the same standard was applied to this board, Respert24 would have reached legend status after just one post instead of needing 3 or 4.
The bar for glioblastoma is so low that if the same standard was applied to this board, Sean007 could have ... stopped at ... just one ellipses. Butt it isn't so he didn't.
The bar for glioblastoma is so low that if the same standard was applied to this board, CruJones would have qualified for Hell Track with no hassle whatsoever. #SendMeAnAngel #DeepCut
The bar for glioblastoma is so low that if the same standard was applied to this board, ABetterPerson could claim he had friends (any like of a post would meet the criteria) or that he didn't live in his mom's basement (because it's technically a split level).
I hope this clears things up. We should show a more substantial effect in glioblasoma and get some interested parties out of it. I like these two strategies Dr. J has going. Both will bring about relatively quick success, which gives us negotiating leverage when it comes to partnerships or buyouts.
The bar for glioblastoma is so low
(how low is it?)
The bar for glioblastoma is so low that if the same standard was applied to this board, Hulk could get his posts qualified as positive or even optimistic.
The bar for glioblastoma is so low that if the same standard was applied to this board, Jlang could tout his scientific acumen.
The bar for glioblastoma is so low that if the same standard was applied to this board, Craig would have a participation trophy for his cubby.
The bar for glioblastoma is so low that if the same standard was applied to this board, Respert24 would have reached legend status after just one post instead of needing 3 or 4.
The bar for glioblastoma is so low that if the same standard was applied to this board, Sean007 could have ... stopped at ... just one ellipses. Butt it isn't so he didn't.
The bar for glioblastoma is so low that if the same standard was applied to this board, CruJones would have qualified for Hell Track with no hassle whatsoever. #SendMeAnAngel #DeepCut
The bar for glioblastoma is so low that if the same standard was applied to this board, ABetterPerson could claim he had friends (any like of a post would meet the criteria) or that he didn't live in his mom's basement (because it's technically a split level).
I hope this clears things up. We should show a more substantial effect in glioblasoma and get some interested parties out of it. I like these two strategies Dr. J has going. Both will bring about relatively quick success, which gives us negotiating leverage when it comes to partnerships or buyouts.
(20)
(0)