i wonder if there is evidence that Nader and Kaz d
Post# of 148152
This is what i think the SEC is claiming happened, I'm sure Nader and Kaz defense is they did not know what the FDA was going to do or that the BLA was as incomplete as it was. Playing dumb basically.
It just seems strange that they both sold when they did, as much as they both knew the BLA was incomplete, they must have discussed there intentions to sell there stock at that time to each other. I don't think they should be in court separately, they were very coordinated in their actions and i wonder if one will be afraid the other will rat them out on the plan that is verbal amongst only them.