Glad you admit you LIED about Juno being in a rese
Post# of 7795
(Total Views: 308)
Posted On: 08/28/2023 8:42:20 AM
Re: Coat Tail Rider #7741
Glad you admit you LIED about Juno being in a reserve area.
But why would you do that if it’s no big deal, as you now claim?
Why would you go out of your way and call Parsons a liar, when in fact it was you that was LYING?
Hmmm
What permit?
1A-31.0022 “Prior Agreements” state that grandfathered sites are exempt and unaffected from the July 2009 revisions as long as the permit doesn’t expire. The Juno permit expired in 2014, and new permits can’t be issued for sites within research reserve areas per 1A-31.0045(6). FACT!
The previous Corp permit was only valid and renewable if the Juno recovery permit with the Bureau was active and maintained per Special Conditions 14 and 15. FACT!
Those grandfathered permits expired and so the July 2009 revisions to the statutes now apply.
What statute can you site that entitles SFRX the right to commence salvage of the wreck that the Corp is violating?
The Order giving SFRX exclusive ownership rights to the wreck which is in state waters say that the salvage of the wreck is governed by the state of Florida through their permitting process. It doesn’t order Florida to issue a permit, nor does it order the Corp to issue one and allow SFRX to start salvaging the wreck.
I’m not saying SFRX won’t get a permit and salvage Juno, but where’s the legal path to do so? It should be easy to state.
I’m glad EXPL isn’t waiting on permits and playing the victim while issuing a tonnage of shares.
BTW, you responded on Saturday with more LIES to a post I made on Friday.
https://minterrornews.com/news-2-15-22-dave-c...wreck.html
But why would you do that if it’s no big deal, as you now claim?
Why would you go out of your way and call Parsons a liar, when in fact it was you that was LYING?
Hmmm
Quote:
You keep declaring yada yada about this so important reserve area that seems to have no affect on the permit.
What permit?
1A-31.0022 “Prior Agreements” state that grandfathered sites are exempt and unaffected from the July 2009 revisions as long as the permit doesn’t expire. The Juno permit expired in 2014, and new permits can’t be issued for sites within research reserve areas per 1A-31.0045(6). FACT!
The previous Corp permit was only valid and renewable if the Juno recovery permit with the Bureau was active and maintained per Special Conditions 14 and 15. FACT!
Those grandfathered permits expired and so the July 2009 revisions to the statutes now apply.
What statute can you site that entitles SFRX the right to commence salvage of the wreck that the Corp is violating?
The Order giving SFRX exclusive ownership rights to the wreck which is in state waters say that the salvage of the wreck is governed by the state of Florida through their permitting process. It doesn’t order Florida to issue a permit, nor does it order the Corp to issue one and allow SFRX to start salvaging the wreck.
I’m not saying SFRX won’t get a permit and salvage Juno, but where’s the legal path to do so? It should be easy to state.
I’m glad EXPL isn’t waiting on permits and playing the victim while issuing a tonnage of shares.
BTW, you responded on Saturday with more LIES to a post I made on Friday.
https://minterrornews.com/news-2-15-22-dave-c...wreck.html
(0)
(0)Seafarer Exploration (SFRX) Stock Research Links
Scroll down for more posts ▼