Goldilocks I have never said Juno was protected. I
Post# of 7795
(Total Views: 181)
Posted On: 08/15/2023 12:00:16 AM
Re: Coat Tail Rider #7702
Goldilocks I have never said Juno was protected. I said Parsons said it was and you called him a liar.
When I asked for proof, you never provided it.
I have been asking the question, is it protected and if it is, where’s the proof?
From you it’s crickets.
When I ask which Fisher gave Kyle the (ahem) $15B valuation, it’s crickets.
Longs whine for years and years that the state has an agenda (duh), and SFRX whines that they were held up by the state at Melbourne.
Today SFRX says the permit for Juno may not get issued and you say it was a requirement that they say that.
But they have not said that in the previous two filings regarding Juno.
Why was it only required for the current filing, and not the previous ones?
I look forward to you not answering…….yet again, while you continue to whine like the other longs.
When I asked for proof, you never provided it.
I have been asking the question, is it protected and if it is, where’s the proof?
From you it’s crickets.
When I ask which Fisher gave Kyle the (ahem) $15B valuation, it’s crickets.
Longs whine for years and years that the state has an agenda (duh), and SFRX whines that they were held up by the state at Melbourne.
Today SFRX says the permit for Juno may not get issued and you say it was a requirement that they say that.
But they have not said that in the previous two filings regarding Juno.
Why was it only required for the current filing, and not the previous ones?
I look forward to you not answering…….yet again, while you continue to whine like the other longs.
(0)
(0)Seafarer Exploration (SFRX) Stock Research Links
Scroll down for more posts ▼