Correct, Seafarer doesn't need a manifest to know
Post# of 7803
(Total Views: 217)
Posted On: 07/13/2023 11:54:57 AM
Correct, Seafarer doesn't need a manifest to know if there is treasure on a site now.
Glad you are keeping up.
This may come as a shock to you, but the company would rather confirm what they are seeing is actually treasure via laying hands on it before showing to the public what their scans look like.
Also, how would they do that? Delete location markers on the data and scans? And doing this before confirmation? Do you not see problems with either way?
Would that answer your concerns? Of course it would not. Quit pretending otherwise.
And now you are attacking Kyle for a media deal while in the next sentence you say non-trading .0001 EXPL had a nondisclosure for their media deal and so it could not be discussed.
Yet again, more useless attempts to discredit SFRX by the trinket troll.
Trippy, next time, try for tonnage instead of trinkets and maybe your company would still be trading shares.
Glad you are keeping up.
This may come as a shock to you, but the company would rather confirm what they are seeing is actually treasure via laying hands on it before showing to the public what their scans look like.
Also, how would they do that? Delete location markers on the data and scans? And doing this before confirmation? Do you not see problems with either way?
Would that answer your concerns? Of course it would not. Quit pretending otherwise.
And now you are attacking Kyle for a media deal while in the next sentence you say non-trading .0001 EXPL had a nondisclosure for their media deal and so it could not be discussed.
Yet again, more useless attempts to discredit SFRX by the trinket troll.
Trippy, next time, try for tonnage instead of trinkets and maybe your company would still be trading shares.
(0)
(0)