So to clarify, SFRX has already invented a device
Post# of 7795
(Total Views: 140)
Posted On: 07/11/2023 1:55:47 AM
So to clarify, SFRX has already invented a device that clears the water on the bottom when it's too dark from poor clarity to see down there by pumping fresh water from the top down where the divers are. They've used it many times. Clever. Smart.
They are currently making a handheld version of the SeaSearcher metal discriminator. Smart to expand on a product when you are 100% confident that it works. The handheld version tells me it works. Or at least they sure think it does. So, they move on to fitting it to a handheld size. Makes sense.
And apparently they are building something that can sense a ship in the water from 50 miles away.
Someone unfamiliar with science would say that's impossible.
Consider this:
https://www.americanoceans.org/facts/how-far-...f%20humans.
That also seems impossible.
Or crazy shit like this:
https://www.cancer.org.au/iheard/can-animals-...nd%20sweat.
But I'm not dumb enough to say this is 100% false, that I know more about sharks and cancer than biologist and doctors – because I don't.
If I was going to go all out and put it all on the line that I was definitely 100% right about something, I think I would at least be able to say or have some idea as to why I was right. Have an understanding of the science behind something full enough to argue my point. So I don't say something stupid like, "Just look outside around you! Duh! Obviously the world is flat!"
How would a device like the one they are building work? I don't know. Don't work for either SFRX or Wild Manta. But I bet it does have something to do with detecting parts per billion or even trillion in the water (because there are sensors that do this) of something a decomposing ship from the colonial era gives off. Something a ship from that time period gives off that other, newer ones don't. Maybe in the wood? Wouldn't be able to pinpoint it but just know it's there somewhere? Again, don't know. Could be totally wrong. Also, not my problem. Something for the multiple scientists to be doing.
But not stupid enough to say people a whole lot smarter than me don't know what they are doing.
I did notice one of my favorite words in the video... did you spot it??
LOL!
Tonnage Trippy, not .0001 trinkets!!!
They are currently making a handheld version of the SeaSearcher metal discriminator. Smart to expand on a product when you are 100% confident that it works. The handheld version tells me it works. Or at least they sure think it does. So, they move on to fitting it to a handheld size. Makes sense.
And apparently they are building something that can sense a ship in the water from 50 miles away.
Someone unfamiliar with science would say that's impossible.
Consider this:
Quote:
Role of Ampullae of Lorenzini
Sharks have a specialized sensory system called the Ampullae of Lorenzini, which allows them to detect electrical fields in the water.
This system is made up of small pores located on the shark’s head and snout that are filled with sensory cells.
These cells are extremely sensitive and can detect even the slightest electrical fields in the water, such as those produced by the muscles of other animals.
https://www.americanoceans.org/facts/how-far-...f%20humans.
That also seems impossible.
Or crazy shit like this:
https://www.cancer.org.au/iheard/can-animals-...nd%20sweat.
But I'm not dumb enough to say this is 100% false, that I know more about sharks and cancer than biologist and doctors – because I don't.
If I was going to go all out and put it all on the line that I was definitely 100% right about something, I think I would at least be able to say or have some idea as to why I was right. Have an understanding of the science behind something full enough to argue my point. So I don't say something stupid like, "Just look outside around you! Duh! Obviously the world is flat!"
How would a device like the one they are building work? I don't know. Don't work for either SFRX or Wild Manta. But I bet it does have something to do with detecting parts per billion or even trillion in the water (because there are sensors that do this) of something a decomposing ship from the colonial era gives off. Something a ship from that time period gives off that other, newer ones don't. Maybe in the wood? Wouldn't be able to pinpoint it but just know it's there somewhere? Again, don't know. Could be totally wrong. Also, not my problem. Something for the multiple scientists to be doing.
But not stupid enough to say people a whole lot smarter than me don't know what they are doing.
I did notice one of my favorite words in the video... did you spot it??
LOL!
Tonnage Trippy, not .0001 trinkets!!!
(0)
(0)Seafarer Exploration (SFRX) Stock Research Links
Scroll down for more posts ▼