Wow, lotta straw man arguments. 'No public support for Biden and the Dems in '20? Only if you believe a 7M vote margin is not support. Congressional and special elections then and in '22 belie the claim as well.
Citing a 16th century jurist who believed in witch burnings, as Alito did, to justify repeal of Roe V Wade is hardly honoring the constitution either, nor is inciting an insurrection.
![](http://)
otta straw man arguments. 'No public support for Biden and the Dems in '20? Only if you believe a 7M vote margin is not support. Congressional and special elections then and in '22 belie the claim as well.
Citing a 16th century jurist who believed in witch burnings, as Alito did, to justify repeal of Roe V Wade is hardly honoring the constitution either, nor is inciting an insurrection.
![](http://)
traw man arguments. 'No public support for Biden and the Dems in '20? Only if you believe a 7M vote margin is not support. Congressional and special elections then and in '22 belie the claim as well.
Citing a 16th century jurist who believed in witch burnings, as Alito did, to justify repeal of Roe V Wade is hardly honoring the constitution either, nor is inciting an insurrection.
![](http://)
an arguments. 'No public support for Biden and the Dems in '20? Only if you believe a 7M vote margin is not support. Congressional and special elections then and in '22 belie the claim as well.
Citing a 16th century jurist who believed in witch burnings, as Alito did, to justify repeal of Roe V Wade is hardly honoring the constitution either, nor is inciting an insurrection.
![](http://)
uments. 'No public support for Biden and the Dems in '20? Only if you believe a 7M vote margin is not support. Congressional and special elections then and in '22 belie the claim as well.
Citing a 16th century jurist who believed in witch burnings, as Alito did, to justify repeal of Roe V Wade is hardly honoring the constitution either, nor is inciting an insurrection.
![](http://)
. 'No public support for Biden and the Dems in '20? Only if you believe a 7M vote margin is not support. Congressional and special elections then and in '22 belie the claim as well.
Citing a 16th century jurist who believed in witch burnings, as Alito did, to justify repeal of Roe V Wade is hardly honoring the constitution either, nor is inciting an insurrection.
![](http://)
public support for Biden and the Dems in '20? Only if you believe a 7M vote margin is not support. Congressional and special elections then and in '22 belie the claim as well.
Citing a 16th century jurist who believed in witch burnings, as Alito did, to justify repeal of Roe V Wade is hardly honoring the constitution either, nor is inciting an insurrection.
![](http://)
support for Biden and the Dems in '20? Only if you believe a 7M vote margin is not support. Congressional and special elections then and in '22 belie the claim as well.
Citing a 16th century jurist who believed in witch burnings, as Alito did, to justify repeal of Roe V Wade is hardly honoring the constitution either, nor is inciting an insurrection.
![](http://)
rt for Biden and the Dems in '20? Only if you believe a 7M vote margin is not support. Congressional and special elections then and in '22 belie the claim as well.
Citing a 16th century jurist who believed in witch burnings, as Alito did, to justify repeal of Roe V Wade is hardly honoring the constitution either, nor is inciting an insurrection.
![](http://)
Biden and the Dems in '20? Only if you believe a 7M vote margin is not support. Congressional and special elections then and in '22 belie the claim as well.
Citing a 16th century jurist who believed in witch burnings, as Alito did, to justify repeal of Roe V Wade is hardly honoring the constitution either, nor is inciting an insurrection.
![](http://)
and the Dems in '20? Only if you believe a 7M vote margin is not support. Congressional and special elections then and in '22 belie the claim as well.
Citing a 16th century jurist who believed in witch burnings, as Alito did, to justify repeal of Roe V Wade is hardly honoring the constitution either, nor is inciting an insurrection.
![](http://)
he Dems in '20? Only if you believe a 7M vote margin is not support. Congressional and special elections then and in '22 belie the claim as well.
Citing a 16th century jurist who believed in witch burnings, as Alito did, to justify repeal of Roe V Wade is hardly honoring the constitution either, nor is inciting an insurrection.
![](http://)
s in '20? Only if you believe a 7M vote margin is not support. Congressional and special elections then and in '22 belie the claim as well.
Citing a 16th century jurist who believed in witch burnings, as Alito did, to justify repeal of Roe V Wade is hardly honoring the constitution either, nor is inciting an insurrection.
![](http://)
20? Only if you believe a 7M vote margin is not support. Congressional and special elections then and in '22 belie the claim as well.
Citing a 16th century jurist who believed in witch burnings, as Alito did, to justify repeal of Roe V Wade is hardly honoring the constitution either, nor is inciting an insurrection.
![](http://)
ly if you believe a 7M vote margin is not support. Congressional and special elections then and in '22 belie the claim as well.
Citing a 16th century jurist who believed in witch burnings, as Alito did, to justify repeal of Roe V Wade is hardly honoring the constitution either, nor is inciting an insurrection.
![](http://)
you believe a 7M vote margin is not support. Congressional and special elections then and in '22 belie the claim as well.
Citing a 16th century jurist who believed in witch burnings, as Alito did, to justify repeal of Roe V Wade is hardly honoring the constitution either, nor is inciting an insurrection.
![](http://)
lieve a 7M vote margin is not support. Congressional and special elections then and in '22 belie the claim as well.
Citing a 16th century jurist who believed in witch burnings, as Alito did, to justify repeal of Roe V Wade is hardly honoring the constitution either, nor is inciting an insurrection.
![](http://)
a 7M vote margin is not support. Congressional and special elections then and in '22 belie the claim as well.
Citing a 16th century jurist who believed in witch burnings, as Alito did, to justify repeal of Roe V Wade is hardly honoring the constitution either, nor is inciting an insurrection.
![](http://)
ote margin is not support. Congressional and special elections then and in '22 belie the claim as well.
Citing a 16th century jurist who believed in witch burnings, as Alito did, to justify repeal of Roe V Wade is hardly honoring the constitution either, nor is inciting an insurrection.
![](http://)
rgin is not support. Congressional and special elections then and in '22 belie the claim as well.
Citing a 16th century jurist who believed in witch burnings, as Alito did, to justify repeal of Roe V Wade is hardly honoring the constitution either, nor is inciting an insurrection.
![](http://)
s not support. Congressional and special elections then and in '22 belie the claim as well.
Citing a 16th century jurist who believed in witch burnings, as Alito did, to justify repeal of Roe V Wade is hardly honoring the constitution either, nor is inciting an insurrection.
![](http://)
support. Congressional and special elections then and in '22 belie the claim as well.
Citing a 16th century jurist who believed in witch burnings, as Alito did, to justify repeal of Roe V Wade is hardly honoring the constitution either, nor is inciting an insurrection.
![](http://)
t. Congressional and special elections then and in '22 belie the claim as well.
Citing a 16th century jurist who believed in witch burnings, as Alito did, to justify repeal of Roe V Wade is hardly honoring the constitution either, nor is inciting an insurrection.
![](http://)
gressional and special elections then and in '22 belie the claim as well.
Citing a 16th century jurist who believed in witch burnings, as Alito did, to justify repeal of Roe V Wade is hardly honoring the constitution either, nor is inciting an insurrection.
![](http://)
onal and special elections then and in '22 belie the claim as well.
Citing a 16th century jurist who believed in witch burnings, as Alito did, to justify repeal of Roe V Wade is hardly honoring the constitution either, nor is inciting an insurrection.
![](http://)
nd special elections then and in '22 belie the claim as well.
Citing a 16th century jurist who believed in witch burnings, as Alito did, to justify repeal of Roe V Wade is hardly honoring the constitution either, nor is inciting an insurrection.
![](http://)
cial elections then and in '22 belie the claim as well.
Citing a 16th century jurist who believed in witch burnings, as Alito did, to justify repeal of Roe V Wade is hardly honoring the constitution either, nor is inciting an insurrection.
![](http://)
lections then and in '22 belie the claim as well.
Citing a 16th century jurist who believed in witch burnings, as Alito did, to justify repeal of Roe V Wade is hardly honoring the constitution either, nor is inciting an insurrection.
![](http://)
ns then and in '22 belie the claim as well.
Citing a 16th century jurist who believed in witch burnings, as Alito did, to justify repeal of Roe V Wade is hardly honoring the constitution either, nor is inciting an insurrection.
![](http://)
n and in '22 belie the claim as well.
Citing a 16th century jurist who believed in witch burnings, as Alito did, to justify repeal of Roe V Wade is hardly honoring the constitution either, nor is inciting an insurrection.
![](http://)
in '22 belie the claim as well.
Citing a 16th century jurist who believed in witch burnings, as Alito did, to justify repeal of Roe V Wade is hardly honoring the constitution either, nor is inciting an insurrection.
![](http://)
belie the claim as well.
Citing a 16th century jurist who believed in witch burnings, as Alito did, to justify repeal of Roe V Wade is hardly honoring the constitution either, nor is inciting an insurrection.
![](http://)
the claim as well.
Citing a 16th century jurist who believed in witch burnings, as Alito did, to justify repeal of Roe V Wade is hardly honoring the constitution either, nor is inciting an insurrection.
![](http://)
laim as well.
Citing a 16th century jurist who believed in witch burnings, as Alito did, to justify repeal of Roe V Wade is hardly honoring the constitution either, nor is inciting an insurrection.
![](http://)
s well.
Citing a 16th century jurist who believed in witch burnings, as Alito did, to justify repeal of Roe V Wade is hardly honoring the constitution either, nor is inciting an insurrection.
![](http://)
.
Citing a 16th century jurist who believed in witch burnings, as Alito did, to justify repeal of Roe V Wade is hardly honoring the constitution either, nor is inciting an insurrection.
![](http://)
/>
Citing a 16th century jurist who believed in witch burnings, as Alito did, to justify repeal of Roe V Wade is hardly honoring the constitution either, nor is inciting an insurrection.
![](http://)
r />
Citing a 16th century jurist who believed in witch burnings, as Alito did, to justify repeal of Roe V Wade is hardly honoring the constitution either, nor is inciting an insurrection.
![](http://)
Citing a 16th century jurist who believed in witch burnings, as Alito did, to justify repeal of Roe V Wade is hardly honoring the constitution either, nor is inciting an insurrection.
![](http://)
a 16th century jurist who believed in witch burnings, as Alito did, to justify repeal of Roe V Wade is hardly honoring the constitution either, nor is inciting an insurrection.
![](http://)
h century jurist who believed in witch burnings, as Alito did, to justify repeal of Roe V Wade is hardly honoring the constitution either, nor is inciting an insurrection.
![](http://)
ury jurist who believed in witch burnings, as Alito did, to justify repeal of Roe V Wade is hardly honoring the constitution either, nor is inciting an insurrection.
![](http://)
rist who believed in witch burnings, as Alito did, to justify repeal of Roe V Wade is hardly honoring the constitution either, nor is inciting an insurrection.
![](http://)
ho believed in witch burnings, as Alito did, to justify repeal of Roe V Wade is hardly honoring the constitution either, nor is inciting an insurrection.
![](http://)
ieved in witch burnings, as Alito did, to justify repeal of Roe V Wade is hardly honoring the constitution either, nor is inciting an insurrection.
![](http://)
in witch burnings, as Alito did, to justify repeal of Roe V Wade is hardly honoring the constitution either, nor is inciting an insurrection.
![](http://)
ch burnings, as Alito did, to justify repeal of Roe V Wade is hardly honoring the constitution either, nor is inciting an insurrection.
![](http://)
nings, as Alito did, to justify repeal of Roe V Wade is hardly honoring the constitution either, nor is inciting an insurrection.
![](http://)
as Alito did, to justify repeal of Roe V Wade is hardly honoring the constitution either, nor is inciting an insurrection.
![](http://)
ito did, to justify repeal of Roe V Wade is hardly honoring the constitution either, nor is inciting an insurrection.
![](http://)
d, to justify repeal of Roe V Wade is hardly honoring the constitution either, nor is inciting an insurrection.
![](http://)
justify repeal of Roe V Wade is hardly honoring the constitution either, nor is inciting an insurrection.
![](http://)
y repeal of Roe V Wade is hardly honoring the constitution either, nor is inciting an insurrection.
![](http://)
al of Roe V Wade is hardly honoring the constitution either, nor is inciting an insurrection.
![](http://)
Roe V Wade is hardly honoring the constitution either, nor is inciting an insurrection.
![](http://)
Wade is hardly honoring the constitution either, nor is inciting an insurrection.
![](http://)
s hardly honoring the constitution either, nor is inciting an insurrection.
![](http://)
ly honoring the constitution either, nor is inciting an insurrection.
![](http://)
oring the constitution either, nor is inciting an insurrection.
![](http://)
the constitution either, nor is inciting an insurrection.
![](http://)
nstitution either, nor is inciting an insurrection.
![](http://)
tion either, nor is inciting an insurrection.
![](http://)
ither, nor is inciting an insurrection.
![](http://)
nor is inciting an insurrection.
![](http://)
s inciting an insurrection.
![](http://)
ting an insurrection.
![](http://)
n insurrection.
![](http://)
rrection.
![](http://)
on.
![](http://)
r />
![](http://)
]https://media-cldnry.s-nbcnews.com/image/upload/t_fit-760w,f_auto,q_auto:eco,dpr_2.0/newscms/2020_51/3437014/mtp_data_download_1_2020_12_20.png[/img
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/meet-the-pre...s-n1251845