Thanks map for this reply, Do you think the Arb
Post# of 148161
Do you think the Arbiter could be getting frustrated or even fatigued by everything they're presented with?
How do they keep track of everything and remember all the he said/she said and what is fact and what is fiction?
In order to pressure the sides to come to resolution, the Arbiter must hint to each side, where they feel the case is leaning and in what direction the Arbiter will likely rule in.
Certainly, the arbiter could explain of the consequences to NSF so Amarex could be pressured to settle to keep this to a minimum.
But if the settlement amount is too low, SA won't agree.
Do you think the Arbiter could recommend that this be settled by another means if this becomes too big for this method?
Do you think this Arbitration method is appropriate for this type of case?