Save the company from what exactly.?' Without a
Post# of 13769
(Total Views: 154)
Posted On: 05/26/2023 5:01:05 PM
Re: ThreeEmInEn #4688
Save the company from what exactly.?'
You say the run was a fluke.
Ok, let/s say you are right the run was a fluke.
So what was the share price before that fluke of a run.
It was 0.002 cents
Two years later without the fluke run the stock price today is .0069
So the CEO is responsible for a 345% return over the last two to his shareholders if you take the fluke run out of the equation.
No where to be found hey, I think majority of investors would love to FIND a .345% return on their investment
ROFLMAO!
BTW
If you say the run was a fluke.
That would mean the CEO holds no responsibility for the stock declining 95%.
Because if the rise was a Fluke then the fall from that fluke rise was the result of the fluke not the CEO.
ROFLMAO!
Quote:
Without a fluke run in January 2021...you would be nowhere to be found. That's a sad reality.
You say the run was a fluke.
Ok, let/s say you are right the run was a fluke.
So what was the share price before that fluke of a run.
It was 0.002 cents
Two years later without the fluke run the stock price today is .0069
So the CEO is responsible for a 345% return over the last two to his shareholders if you take the fluke run out of the equation.
No where to be found hey, I think majority of investors would love to FIND a .345% return on their investment
ROFLMAO!
BTW
If you say the run was a fluke.
That would mean the CEO holds no responsibility for the stock declining 95%.
Because if the rise was a Fluke then the fall from that fluke rise was the result of the fluke not the CEO.
ROFLMAO!
(0)
(0)