With a reasoned valuation, it would matter who Kyl
Post# of 7798
![Avatar](/images/ProfileImages/1004_ti0601041.jpg)
BTW, I have challenged the reasoning behind it. It’s beyond laughable as Kyle presented it, but a novice wouldn’t know.
Quote:
A better argument would be to challenge the reasoning behind their evaluation which you are avoiding, of course.
How do you know Gary is wrong? And why would you think that Juno would not be part of their research files?
Kyle may have talked to a guy who serviced the boat or something. I guess that could make him associated with the Fisher organization….somehow.
They can’t ID the wreck, won’t ID the evaluator, and spent several seasons on Juno with no proof of anything significant being there.
But the valuation is valid?
What could go wrong, right?
Teredo crust…….lol.
What happened to the treasure was 5 miles from the ballast pile bullshit claim?
GL with the random wrecks. There’s a .0001% chance they might find something.
![Like This Post](/images/thumb-up.png)
![Dislike This Post](/images/thumb-down.png)