Trippy still getting everything wrong. Althoug
Post# of 7802
(Total Views: 232)
Posted On: 02/22/2023 10:56:01 AM
Trippy still getting everything wrong.
Although they can and are actively in the process of locating shipwrecks, they actually don't need to, not immediately that is. There are plenty of already existing wrecks to explore first. Then they will get to the new wrecks. Unless the state continues to delay so much that they need to move on to a wreck outside of state waters. Either way, the tech will be proved and treasure will be found.
What IS needed is the ability to locate the treasure on already known wrecks. That will keep them busy at first.
They don't need to ID a wreck, they only need to find out if there is treasure on it. While identifying the wreck was a step in the horse and buggy days you like to live in, that is no longer the case.
The CEO was simply being honest about the obvious fact that have yet to announce treasure.
I didn't call Marx a 5th grader. I said the website you linked to for your so-called proof of all known wrecks looks like it was made by a 5th grader. Also the data is over 50 years old.
Kyle did not say the nail size determines the value of the cargo. His interview describes the valuation someone from the Fisher family gave him and the reasoning behind it. If you want to argue their valuation specs, go ahead and try. But asking the MFT group if one of them remembers a conversation from 15 years ago that none of them specifically may have even had proves nothing.
Once again, all of your comments are wrong and useless.
I see why you invested in .0001 EXPL now. You two are a very good fit. Both total failures.
Tonnage, not .0001!
Although they can and are actively in the process of locating shipwrecks, they actually don't need to, not immediately that is. There are plenty of already existing wrecks to explore first. Then they will get to the new wrecks. Unless the state continues to delay so much that they need to move on to a wreck outside of state waters. Either way, the tech will be proved and treasure will be found.
What IS needed is the ability to locate the treasure on already known wrecks. That will keep them busy at first.
They don't need to ID a wreck, they only need to find out if there is treasure on it. While identifying the wreck was a step in the horse and buggy days you like to live in, that is no longer the case.
The CEO was simply being honest about the obvious fact that have yet to announce treasure.
I didn't call Marx a 5th grader. I said the website you linked to for your so-called proof of all known wrecks looks like it was made by a 5th grader. Also the data is over 50 years old.
Kyle did not say the nail size determines the value of the cargo. His interview describes the valuation someone from the Fisher family gave him and the reasoning behind it. If you want to argue their valuation specs, go ahead and try. But asking the MFT group if one of them remembers a conversation from 15 years ago that none of them specifically may have even had proves nothing.
Once again, all of your comments are wrong and useless.
I see why you invested in .0001 EXPL now. You two are a very good fit. Both total failures.
Tonnage, not .0001!
(0)
(0)