Youfeng doesn’t own all. NGIO and Olaregen poten
Post# of 36566
(Total Views: 474)
Posted On: 02/14/2023 11:52:59 PM
Youfeng doesn’t own all. NGIO and Olaregen potentially, but nothing else was part of this bidding process. And phony Joe, always posing like he has any wealth, actually has none, hence he couldn’t aid the four fraudsters with even a dime. All of the above (except our team) defaulted at least once in this process, including Youfeng, but no one proved themselves as having no worth whatsoever as Moscato.
I think at this point I can say I followed a trusted DigitalTradz forum era shareholder into a minority investment into one of the bids, then to aid them I communicated with a few others I knew could be potentially interested, and then from that 4 of us were “minor” investors.
I also sent the Trustee forwarded emails from a GNBT BOD member who served well past claims that the four insiders made during this bidding process, and whom I’ve known since 2009, saying the claims by these four former insiders are nothing that factually happened or he would of been approved. And I highlighted him SEC filings showing him these claims not only never happened, they never were legally SEC reported. I contacted him again when it appeared he not only ignored my potential evidence, but appeared to favor their new bid.
That blew my mind, wondering does the Trustee really care for shareholders first, or slip into an easy out. That’s probably bad on me. We see the Trustee now has selected a firm to potentially file (proper wording?) prosecution against (whom ever?). And he excluded the four insiders I sent information upon. To aid? Please go at him strong!
I think at this point I can say I followed a trusted DigitalTradz forum era shareholder into a minority investment into one of the bids, then to aid them I communicated with a few others I knew could be potentially interested, and then from that 4 of us were “minor” investors.
I also sent the Trustee forwarded emails from a GNBT BOD member who served well past claims that the four insiders made during this bidding process, and whom I’ve known since 2009, saying the claims by these four former insiders are nothing that factually happened or he would of been approved. And I highlighted him SEC filings showing him these claims not only never happened, they never were legally SEC reported. I contacted him again when it appeared he not only ignored my potential evidence, but appeared to favor their new bid.
That blew my mind, wondering does the Trustee really care for shareholders first, or slip into an easy out. That’s probably bad on me. We see the Trustee now has selected a firm to potentially file (proper wording?) prosecution against (whom ever?). And he excluded the four insiders I sent information upon. To aid? Please go at him strong!
(1)
(0)